Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedHack

RedHack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious subject with wording that implies COI. Sources are similar and likely partisan. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it may well be that recent additions were the work of someone with a COI but there's no way to prove that at this stage and it wouldn't really have any impact here anyway - COI is not a reason for deletion. The "see also" lists could be cut right back and there's some ref-spamming going on. But I think there are enough sources to substantiate notability in this instance:

I can't see anything particularly partisan there - almost all are commercial news sources including some international sources. The article needs work but that's not the purpose of AFD. WP:MOS issues can be resolved through normal editing. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; I agree with [User:Stalwart111]]. This article has been edited by close to 20 different registered users, including at least one administrator. There is a lack of conformance to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, but that's not a reason for a deletion discussion. It has a plethora of cites. (I have a hard time getting my head around a 'Marxst-Lenninist hacker group, but that's a problem that can be solved by a text elaboration). WP:COI, that's hard to discern, considering there's been 20 or so registered editors and not an argument for an AfD. And how can any article be a dubious subject? What does that even mean? 'Partisan'? Does that mean WP:POV? That's not a reason for an AfD; besides, who can tell with this article - it has not been developed enough. Keep, and sort it all out by WP:BRD, not drive by tagging. - Neonorange (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]