Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nested Context Language
- Nested Context Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced; fails to meet notability as well as WP:V Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It is (and is already referenced as) an ITU standard. Is the nominator planning on taking every telecoms-related XML standard to AfD? Have they read the comments against such behaviour elsewhere, at recent AfDs and at the RFC/U about them? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Not only is it referenced in the article as an ITU standard as Andy Dingley states, but there are many papers about it in the scholarly literature. I've added four good sources to a new further reading section in the article. It took me all of 2 minutes to find them. It obviously meets the GNG, folks.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, nice amount of source coverage, — Cirt (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)