Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/January
Proposals, January 2013
Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.
If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.
NEW PROPOSALS
Asking for exploratory template, and potential category (Category:Yugoslav football biography stubs). CatScan indicates that Category:Yugoslav footballers and Category:Yugoslav football managers have well over 200 stub articles. Dawynn (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support looks good. --Qetuth (talk) 04:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
{{Japan-mag-stub}}
CatScan indicated over 60 articles of stub length under Category:Japanese magazines. Worth at least building an exploratory template. Would also like approval for Category:Japanese magazine stubs, if article count allows. Dawynn (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Icelandic football competition stus
This template has been more then 60 articles and I propose the following
Mentoz86 (talk) 05:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
With articles from {{Portugal-hist-stub}}, used in 143 articles - Nabla (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support speedy --Qetuth (talk) 17:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Greece geography stubs by regions
Welsh building templates by county
These are definitely needed, do a few bit of work on old buildings of Wales.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- {{Anglesey-struct-stub}}
- {{BlaenauGwent-struct-stub}}
- {{Bridgend-struct-stub}}
- {{Caerphilly-struct-stub}}
- {{Cardiff-struct-stub}}
- {{Carmarthenshire-struct-stub}}
- {{Ceredigion-struct-stub}}
- {{Conwy-struct-stub}}
- {{Denbighshire-struct-stub}}
- {{Flintshire-struct-stub}}
- {{Gwynedd-struct-stub}}
- {{MerthyrTydfil-struct-stub}}
- {{Monmouthshire-struct-stub}}
- {{NeathPortTalbot-struct-stub}}
- {{Newport-struct-stub}}
- {{Pembrokeshire-struct-stub}}
- {{Powys-struct-stub}}
- {{RhonddaCynonTaf-struct-stub}}
- {{Swansea-struct-stub}}
- {{Torfaen-struct-stub}}
- {{ValeofGlamorgan-struct-stub}}
- {{Wrexham-struct-stub}}
- Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support all. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Our geography stubs use preserved counties, which seems strange to me, but I think geo and struct trees shouldn't be using different subdivision styles if avoidable. I'm not sure there is yet reason to split at all, with 172 articles in the main category over 22 counties coming out with less than 8 avg per tag, and churches an easy split-off if needed. --Qetuth (talk) 04:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're forgetting that I'm around..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 22:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- As below - if you're the one that's going to be doing most of the work in the area, I trust your judgement, but we've previously gone with a different way of dividing Wales. --Qetuth (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're forgetting that I'm around..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 22:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Spanish building templates by province
I intend creating a lot of Spanish building stubs, I think these would be useful.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- {{ACoruña-struct-stub}}
- {{Álava-struct-stub}}
- {{Albacete-struct-stub}}
- {{Alicante-struct-stub}}
- {{Almería-struct-stub}}
- {{Asturias-struct-stub}}
- {{Ávila-struct-stub}}
- {{Badajoz-struct-stub}}
- {{Balearics-struct-stub}}
- {{Barcelona-struct-stub}}
- {{Biscay-struct-stub}}
- {{Burgos-struct-stub}}
- {{Cáceres-struct-stub}}
- {{Cádiz-struct-stub}}
- {{Cantabria-struct-stub}}
- {{Castellón-struct-stub}}
- {{CiudadReal-struct-stub}}
- {{Córdoba-struct-stub}}
- {{Cuenca-struct-stub}}
- {{Girona-struct-stub}}
- {{Granada-struct-stub}}
- {{Guadalajara-struct-stub}}
- {{Gipuzkoa-struct-stub}}
- {{Huelva-struct-stub}}
- {{Huesca-struct-stub}}
- {{Jaén-struct-stub}}
- {{LasPalmas-struct stub}}
- {{León-struct-stub}}
- {{Lleida-struct-stub}}
- {{Lugo-struct-stub}}
- {{Madrid-struct-stub}}
- {{Málaga-struct-stub}}
- {{Murcia-struct-stub}}
- {{Navarre-struct-stub}}
- {{Ourense-struct-stub}}
- {{Palencia-struct-stub}}
- {{Pontevedra-struct-stub}}
- {{La Rioja-struct-stub}}
- {{Salamanca-struct-stub}}
- {{Segovia-struct-stub}}
- {{Seville-struct-stub}}
- {{Soria-struct-stub}}
- {{Tarragona-struct-stub}}
- {{Tenerife-struct-stub}}
- {{Teruel-struct-stub}}
- {{Toledo-struct-stub}}
- {{Valencia-struct-stub}}
- {{Valladolid-struct-stub}}
- {{Zamora-struct-stub}}
- {{Zaragoza-struct-stub}}
- Support all, with the usual disambiguators. (Guadalajara, for instance - there's also the one in Mexico. Not sure what the protocol would be, tho'.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support all. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Minor point: they should have dashs not spaces before stub. I know Victoria (Australia) gets stub tagged as VictoriaAU, so maybe append ES when it's needed? After checking, it looks like we do that already for {{LaRiojaES-geo-stub}} but thre is no prior Guadalajara stub tag as it is covered by {{CastileLaMancha-geo-stub}}. I notice this list is a lot more extensive than the geography categories, eg A Coruna, Lugo etc are grouped under {{Galicia-geo-stub}}, and many others are similarly collected by autonomous community rather than province. I don't know how many articles you are making, but it would currently average less than 10 articles per province. Is a full by province split the best idea when it is already largely split by building type (and Catalonia), or would by Autonomous community to match the geography cats do the job better? --Qetuth (talk) 04:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Do you think I'd have proposed this if the intention wasn't to dramatically populate them?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 22:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, you have a better idea than me about the scope of growth (obviously) - I was just pointing out that there were two possible ways to split up Spain and we've previously gone with the other one. If you believe province is better, I'll trust you on that. --Qetuth (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Do you think I'd have proposed this if the intention wasn't to dramatically populate them?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 22:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)