Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIPS Computer Institute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JBW (talk | contribs) at 12:12, 19 November 2012 (→NIPS Computer Institute: Delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 12:12, 19 November 2012 by JBW (talk | contribs) (→NIPS Computer Institute: Delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Apart from the considerations mentioned below,t he article was a clear copyright infringement of http://www.nipsedu.org.in/pages_mis.php?q=2. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- NIPS Computer Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails to meet WP:GNG. Amartyabag TALK2ME 06:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with nominator, this is a non-notable minor organisation. --Bob Re-born (talk) 10:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.