Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visiting Students Research Programme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Metropolitan90 (talk | contribs) at 03:15, 4 April 2012 (Visiting Students Research Programme). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Visiting Students Research Programme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic does not have notability for having a separate article. It is covered in its main article Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Anbu121 (talk me) 09:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There is no significant information in it to merge except the lead, which is also present in its parent article. If merged, the remaining information present in this article becomes a trivia in the context of its parent article. --Anbu121 (talk me) 06:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SW— express 21:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]