Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One (programming language)

Formula One (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I looked through the Google results, including Google books and Google scholar, and found nothing. Msnicki (talk) 17:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sad that this has been around since 1992 and currently does not have any Notability. Phearson (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Msnicki (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Constraint logic programming because the language's website says the syntax is based on Trilogy, and Trilogy is mentioned in an article in BYTE called "Constraint logic programming" (Feb 1995). I can't find any evidence of notability for F1, even on its own website. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:R#PLA we should not redirect to an article unless the redirected term is mentioned on the target article in a prominent way. That is not the case now, and merging the content to there may give this weight – no other constraint logic PLs are mentioned there. In spite of the positive review in BYTE we also have no article on Trilogy (I haven't read the BYTE review, but I assume this is about the language and system developed by Paul J. Voda). --Lambiam 22:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]