Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Fraize

Peter Fraize

Not enough reliable sources found to verify notability. Was tagged for CSD:G12 due to confirmed COPYVIO. I cleaned up the COPYVIO, however my research on subject's notability was inconclusive. I did find several articles[1] on the subject, however they are all PPV, so I am unable to determine just how much of the articles are about the subject. — X S G 04:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Despite being nom, I request we let this AfD run its full course. My reason for keep is that a new reference was just added; in a book, subject is referred to as "a noted saxophonist". Combine that with my research and I'm convinced he's notable, I just don't think the article properly reflects this, yet (nor do I know the best way to make it so). — X S G 06:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've added several more references and slightly expanded the article as well as formatting it. If nothing else, he passes on his discography. Both Cadence Records and Safari Records are notable, albeit niche, labels. I've also notified this AfD to WikiProject Jazz to see if they have any input to make to this discussion. Voceditenore (talk) 07:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have a paid subscription to Highbeam Reasearch and have personally accessed the entire articles listed in the references. Apart from the article about the 2000 Wammie Award, the articles are predominantly about the subject. Voceditenore (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]