Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gourdinian Language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user fk3FGRg9jvfefr22 (talk | contribs) at 01:24, 28 April 2009 (Gourdinian Language: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Gourdinian Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is not blatant enough for a speedy tag (which I declined), but I can't really find anything to verify this at all. Is it a hoax? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  00:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a hoax. Nothing on Google Books, and, ahem, nothing in a collection of books including Algeo and Pyles. 5 speakers? Western Europe? But it isn't even in a country somewhere? Or is it Italy? Pff, nonsense. Please deliver a stern warning to the creator--I have a wiffle bat you can borrow. Drmies (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:MADEUP. Doesn't even make sense. Also vandalized the article on Romance languages. Drawn Some (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete per WP:MADEUP. The editor who added the initial Speedy tag points us to this page, which does seem to indicate that the person who created the article also created the language (as if that wasn't obvious already).

    For the record, another editor added a speedy tag again, but I removed it -- partly because we're in the middle of an AFD discussion, but partly because I agree with LinguistAtLarge that this shouldn't really fall under the category of "obvious vandalism". Stuff made up one day added to Wikipedia can just be someone misunderstanding the purpose of Wikipedia, rather than intentionally damaging the encyclopedia. --Miskwito (talk) 01:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]