Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iraqi Virtual Science Library

Fails WP:N and WP:RS. No sources to indicate notability. It just seems to be a study tool for certain academics. Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 08:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not much content and also has no sources to which we can check this information is true. BountyHunter2008 (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, 25 gnews hits, 6 gscholar hits show there are enough RS's like [1] to build an article on.John Z (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found. Pie is good ^{(Apple is the best)} 20:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of content, subject to change if someone can draw from the sources found. Mandsford (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep' plenty of info available from which to build an article. I'll start doing so. Would like to remind people that no sources in the article doesn't mean they don't exist. TravellingCari 17:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]