Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedagoogling

Pedagoogling

Neologism with zero Google hits: references cited do not mention the term either, but just establish use of the terms "pedagogy" or "Googling" respectively. Delete for failing to meet notability/verifiability criteria. The Anome (talk) 12:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unverifiable neologism per nom. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. Wikipedia is not a dictionary or for new phrases you came up with. --Pixelface (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable neologism. And I first read it as pedogoogling... JIP | Talk 18:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense neologism. JuJube (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete On the article's talk page, the author makes a very telling remark that it will become a very common phrase in eductional circles . When it does, it'll be time for an article. Beeblbrox (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as JohnCD said, Wikipeida is not for thinkgs made up one day. U$er (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]