Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo GameCube Linux

Nintendo GameCube Linux

Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought Chealer 16:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, weasel-worded original research, possibly unverifiable too. (Damn it, another weasel word...) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 16:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree that it is original research - The project itself may be original research but an article about it cannot be. Terrymr 06:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Feel free to improve the article with [1] and [2] among other sources. This article may be poor, but I think being in Forbes and Wired meets any reasonable notability criteria and satisfies the question of this being "original thought" . Mister.Manticore 17:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mister.Manticore already said it, I'll refrain from repeating. spazure (contribs) (review) 05:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Embedded Linux. Leibniz 15:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that's valid, as while it might be appropriate to mention this there, I do feel it's distinct enough on its own to merit an article. Mister.Manticore 17:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too crufty and weaselly for that. Leibniz 18:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In which case, the article is rewritten. Mister.Manticore 18:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources suggested by Mister Manticore. Ideally, merge along with similar articles (eg Xbox Linux) into somewhere more appropriate such as Linux on game consoles or, as suggested above, Embedded Linux. Jakew 00:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge as above into an article about Linux on games consoles, Embedded Linux is a bit too catch-all for such a thing.. Xmoogle 12:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]