Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo GameCube Linux
- Nintendo GameCube Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought Chealer 16:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, weasel-worded original research, possibly unverifiable too. (Damn it, another weasel word...) Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 16:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree that it is original research - The project itself may be original research but an article about it cannot be. Terrymr 06:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Feel free to improve the article with [1] and [2] among other sources. This article may be poor, but I think being in Forbes and Wired meets any reasonable notability criteria and satisfies the question of this being "original thought" . Mister.Manticore 17:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Mister.Manticore already said it, I'll refrain from repeating. spazure (contribs) (review) 05:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into Embedded Linux. Leibniz 15:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- No, I don't think that's valid, as while it might be appropriate to mention this there, I do feel it's distinct enough on its own to merit an article. Mister.Manticore 17:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Too crufty and weaselly for that. Leibniz 18:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- In which case, the article is rewritten. Mister.Manticore 18:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- No, I don't think that's valid, as while it might be appropriate to mention this there, I do feel it's distinct enough on its own to merit an article. Mister.Manticore 17:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)