User talk:guninvalid

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 185 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 2.

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Roseto effect on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infowars

they got unbanned with source. (preceeding unsigned comment left by User:Coconut0330 17:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC))[reply]

and that source is...? guninvalid (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look on the Infowars talk page. Coconut0330 (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PBS BBC and CBS. Coconut0330 (talk) 18:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wynwick55gl

we seem to have just missed an edit conflict at that user's talk page. Most of their edits today have been borderline disruptive, so I wonder if you might consider self-reverting to avoid mixed messages? Your call. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:46, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's fun lol. Typically, when I welcome problematic people, I send a standard welcome and write a new section for the warning, but you seem to have already done that. As disruptive as they may or may not seem (i haven't really looked into it), I do think it is worth at least being welcoming, so they feel they can still correct themselves and feel welcomed. That's just my personal feeling though, so I won't be reverting. Thanks for the tip! I plan to follow the AfD for the next week and if I decide I feel a certain way, maybe then I'll !vote that way. At least for now though, I would prefer to stay on the sidelines. guninvalid (talk) 09:53, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closure of move discussion

Hi, @Guninvalid:
I partially disagree with your closure of the requested move that was recently discussed at Talk:June 2025 Los Angeles protests. Even if no consensus exists about the last word of the title of that page, I think that a relatively clear consensus exists in favor of removing the word "June" from the title. If you agree, perhaps you can amend your closure to reflect this. Otherwise, I may open a new move discussion. Thanks! –Gluonz^{talk contribs} 21:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Gluonz. Maybe, but that was still a minority opinion, and not the central question in the proposed move. If you think that removing the month could have support, you may open a new RM or take it to WP:AN. For what it's worth, I would oppose removing June per WP:CRYSTALBALL. guninvalid (talk) 22:12, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Throning

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Throning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do I find the IATA flight No. ICAO flight No. and call sign for an accident or incident

I don't know where to find the information for the infobox. Zaptain United (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hi @Zaptain United. I saw this when you posted it but I thought you posted this on AWF's page. I don't know, I don't really know much about aviation much in general. I'm just a Wikipedian who watched a shitton of Mentour Pilor and Mayday Air Disaster. I just know some WP policy and some operational stuff about planes; that's it. Sorry for the inconvenience. guninvalid (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Throning

Hello, Guninvalid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Throning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:JEL classification codes on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (talk|botop) 16:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Presidential election templates on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 13:41, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great flattening has been accepted

Great flattening, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Soul's Remnant

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soul's Remnant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pacu Jalur on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 07:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:ANO (political party) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 11:30, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CVE-2025-1094

Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CVE-2025-1094, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 02:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chen Weihua

You referred to notability on the Chen Weihua talk page, although I don't think you were making any claims about whether the subject itself was notable. I would like to hear your opinion on the article's notability though. I don't think there's any chance of an AfD being worthwhile if an IP were the only one making the case.

WP:PSTS, part of the policy WP:OR: "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources." or WP:REPUTABLE, part of the guideline WP:RS: "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."
Most of the article's overview of Chen's career and education are based on profiles that are published by outlets he is affiliated with (universities, newspapers). These profiles are usually submitted by the subject and are only subject to stylistic edits. They are not independent. What remains are a series of articles published that mention or discuss Twitter arguments he has gotten into in the past five or so years.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ira Brad Matetsky (2nd nomination) closed as delete, with the cited rationale: "I am particularly persuaded by 28byte's remarks about the "problems with piecing together a biographical article about someone about whom no proper biography has been written in reliable sources. You get woefully incomplete and outdated scraps of information that do not cohere into a proper, comprehensive narrative about the man’s life and career." We should take this into consideration for all BLP articles, frankly." Do you see this case as analogous?

103.87.254.62 (talk) 02:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, looking through the sources, a number of them are obviously garbage. I think I'll go ahead and start a AfD. I can't see him meeting WP:BLP or WP:NJOURNALIST. guninvalid (talk) 03:33, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 21st century political violence in the United States (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Political violence in the United States. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:21st century political violence in the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pythoncoder: Would this be able to be moved over the redirect? Political violence in the United States is a redirect to civil disobedience which isn't the same thing. guninvalid (talk) 16:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...or rather it was until yesterday. guninvalid (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats, you survived the Charlie Kirk move discussion. Thanks for all you've done during this time. Babysharkb☩ss2 ^(DEADMAU5) 17:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks lmao guninvalid (talk) 17:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Syngenta on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 10:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CVE-2025-1094

Hello, Guninvalid. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "CVE-2025-1094".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snowbreak: Containment Zone (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Passengerpigeon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snowbreak: Containment Zone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Passenger pigeon (talk) 03:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guninvalid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Passenger pigeon (talk) 03:40, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Guninvalid. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by jolielover♥talk 09:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Mistake

Hello. You recently reverted an edit on 2025 California Prop 50. You appear to have made a mistake regarding your removal, so I reverted it. An organization's own webpage is considered a valid source. Lists of endorsements should only include endorsements which have been covered by reliable sources, which may include the organization's own website or official social media accounts. News media is itself a reliable source. Based on your criteria, I noticed that you did not remove other endorsements that fell under the exact same criteria (endorsements published by the media organization itself), nor did you remove media endorsements from effectively every election page on this website. I figured you made a mistake when reading the sources. BobSmithME (talk) 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the above: using the flawed criteria about 'primary sources', almost all of the organizations & media endorsements in major elections like the 2025 New York City mayoral election or 2024 United States presidential election would have to be removed.

Please consult Wikipedia:ENDORSE @Guninvalid Aesurias (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:North Korea on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 03:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Guninvalid! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Notability of news orgs and finding sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Operation Sonnenblume on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 03:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Benjamin Netanyahu on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 22:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 14:30, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Communist state elections

Hi!

Short summary:

In liberal-democratic systems, an election is:
1. A stand-alone event;
2. Centered on competition for power;
3. Determining which party or coalition governs;
4. Based on individual votes expressing preferences.
In communist state systems, an election is:
1. A stage in the continuous process of people's participation and political renewal;
2. Conducted within the existing power framework, not to change it;
3. Designed to affirm the unity of the people, not express division;
4. Managed through transmission belt mass organizations, not parties in competition.
And this means that communist state constitutions and practice made elections only one step in a cyclical process of governance:
1. Nomination through transmission belt mass organizations.
2. Consultation and discussion about the nominees
3. Formal election, typically with near-unanimous approval.
4. Continuous accountability — deputies or delegates were expected to report back and could be recalled.

I have written and created the articles supreme state organ of power, unified power, and communist state constitution. I am also planning to create an article titled "Communist state elections" (or "Elections in communist states") and "System of state organs of power", as well as improving articles that I have already created, such as the permanent organ of the supreme state organ of power. Wikipedia is lacking many basic articles on communist states, and I have taken it upon myself to create them and improve the existing ones. To make a cohesive article structure that make sense both factually (and for our readers), the election names should also be changed.

But I woke up yesterday, and understood I was overthinking it. What about, instead of the 2019 North Korean parliamentary election, we go for 2019 North Korean supreme state organ of power election, or instead of the 1984 Soviet legislative election, we go for 1984 Soviet supreme state organ of power election? Would that be an acceptable compromise? TheUzbek (talk) 08:05, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In short, @TheUzbek, I simply don't agree that elections in ML theory differ eniugh from Western democratic elections to warrant a title change. That's what they're based on, after all. In fact, while ctrl+f-ing, I noticed that the very first paragraph of the SSOP arricle section on elections clearly states that according to ML theory, elections are indeed elections. I do think it's justified to strike "parliamentary" from many of these titles, but adding SSOP would, again, be overly WP:PRECISE at the cost of being WP:CONCISE. I think it's worth putting SSOP in the first paragraph of the articles, if not the first sentence, but I don't buy that it's worth attaching to the titles. If for no other reason, because the strongest silly American has no idea what that is, and the weakest North Korean doesn't speak English. guninvalid (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As an addition, points 1 and 4 of your Western democracy election description could, at least nominally, apply in Soviet elections. By their collapse, points 1-4 applied. It can be argued that point 1 doesn't apply, but it's hard to argue that in a sense that doesn't also apply to USA elections. Points 1-2 of your communist elections could also apply in the USA and UK. The USA's existing power framework is the US Constitution, and the UK's existing power framework is The Crown. Point 3 can, at least nominally, also be applied to the USA and UK. Even point 4 can be argued to include the USA, especially given the historical power of the captains of industry (see Gilded Age and Second Gilded Age^[a]). As for your conclusion, traditional lobbying exists just as much in USA elections as it does in Chinese or Soviet elections, perhaps far more. And while Western democratic elections tend to be nowhere near unanimous, sometimes they are: see the USA in 1932, 1936, 1940, 1944, 1980, and 1984. guninvalid (talk) 08:37, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).

[a]