Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinity learn

Infinity learn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails to demonstrate notability through independent, reliable sources, relying instead on press releases and affiliated content. Its promotional tone and lack of in-depth third-party coverage make it unsuitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:32, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:32, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Technology, Internet, and Telangana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Sri Chaitanya Educational Institutions: Definately promo in tone, but it is a project of a notable company, merge the sourced content to existing section at Sri Chaitanya Educational Institutions#Infinity Learn. Although, it seems to have borderline notability due to some news coverage, but I'm not sure if it is reliable enough. Merge if not Keep. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern regarding the notability and reliance on affiliated sources. I've already removed several promotional or affiliated references and replaced them with some independent sources that I believe are more neutral and reliable.

Could you please guide me further on the kind of changes that would align this article with Wikipedia's notability guidelines? Specifically:

Are there certain sources currently in the article that still do not meet the standard of independence and reliability?
Would adding coverage from particular types of third-party publications (e.g. newspapers, academic journals, industry reviews) help establish notability?
Are there tone-related areas you feel still read as promotional?

I'm eager to improve the article and would appreciate any specific suggestions you can offer to help bring it in line with Wikipedia's expectations. Mahendra2601 (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahendra2601 Just a quick question, were you paid for creating this article? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NCORP. I G11'd this last time it was created and this version is not fundamentally better. Sourcing does not satisfy WP:ORGIND, essentially consisting of rehashed press releases. ~ A412 ^talk! 14:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]