Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop

 Illustration workshop
  Photography workshop
  Map workshop
New request 

Skip to:

• Table of contents
• First discussion
• End of page
• ▶ New request ◀

Graphics Lab/Map workshop

The Graphics Lab is a project to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. Requests for image improvements can be added to the workshop pages: Illustrations, Photographs and Maps. For questions or suggestions one can use the talk pages: Talk:Graphics Lab, Talk:Illustrations, Talk:Photographs and Talk:Maps.
This specific page is the requests page for the Map workshop. Anyone can make a request for a map to be created or improved for a Wikipedia article. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
You are encouraged to share information and request advice from others. Also see possible conventions toolbox, map tutorials and topographic map tutorials.

Advice to requesters

What do we do? Location maps Area maps (animals, languages, empires, etc.) Historical and conflict related maps Battle maps Technical maps (archaeology, city closeups, etc.) Sourced requests: If possible, please try to provide a reliable source to create a map. This includes a map already on Wikipedia with a reliable source or an external link. Please check: Please check back regularly to see if progress has been made or if any additional questions need to be answered before the request can be completed. Direct collaboration: Some mapmakers are especially interested by one topic area. If you notice a mapmaker fitting your needs, consider asking on their personal talk page to request maps. {{Reqmap}}: To request a map, you can also tag the talk page of the article in need of a map with or {{Reqmapin|Australia}} (articles then appear in Category:Wikipedia requested maps) If a request is done to your satisfaction, please mark it with {{resolved}}.

Advice to Graphists

Templates

Result	Code	Usage
Resolved	{{resolved}} ~~~~	Mark a thread as resolved and request archiving
Bumping thread.	{{subst:bump}}	Delay automatic archiving of a section for 30 days
Request taken.	{{I take|~~~~}}	When you'll be working on the request
Done	{{Done}} ~~~~	When the request is done

Map workshop requests archives
	Earlier Image workshops: 2006 2007 2008 pre-2009 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.

Request

Countries where Holocaust denial is illegal

• 
  Holocaust map
• Description of second image (if needed)
  Description of second image (if needed)
• Description of third image (if needed; don't request too many at once, though)
  Description of third image (if needed; don't request too many at once, though)

Article(s)

Legality of Holocaust denial

Request

Details of your request go here... -- Sweden should be pink, as it recently passed a law outlawing Holocaust denial/questioning, but it won't take effect until 2027. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Admiral Farmer (talk • contribs)

Discussion

@Admiral Farmer  Done – Isochrone (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Request: New Location maps of Angola are needed. Province and municipal division was changed in August 2024.

• 
  Outdated Location Map of Angola. New additional border lines are needed: a) Cuando Cubango Province was split into two provinces. b) New Icolo e Bengo Province was separated from earlier much larger Luanda Province. c) Moxico Leste Province (i.e. East Moxico) was separated from Moxico Province.
• 
  Relief locator with outdated administrative borders. Same corrections are needed as in previous map.
• 
  Example of outdated location map of a province. Eastern part of this Moxico Province is now Moxico Leste. In practice, all 21 provinces need new location maps.

Article(s)

Very many geography related articles of Angola. For example, all maps of the article Provinces of Angola needs to be updated with new administrative borders. All articles of current provinces of Angola need a new location map. Cities and other locations in Angola typically use Template:Location map, and the background maps of Angola used needs to be updated. Perhaps this one replaces the existing administrative and topographic maps of Angola used in the country template, with newer ones?

Request

The Law on the political-administrative division of Angola of 22 August 2024 changed the provincial and local division of the country. As a result, Angola now has 21 provinces instead of 18, and the number of municipalities has almost doubled from 164 to 326. You can read about this e.g. in Provinces of Angola, and in some other wikipedias like fi:Angolan maakunnat (and about current municipalities: fi:Angolan kunnat), which have updated their content already.

The Angolan law 14/24 describes the boundaries of each administrative region, province by province and municipality by municipality. I found that only few news media published a map showing the main features of the new regional division, here is one which could help: Unfortunately, some of the official publications, like the presidential decree 268/24, included a map with distorted proportions (Angola has been flattened in a north-south direction).

As a result, at the very least, the general administrative and topographical map of Angola should be renewed (c:Category:Location maps of Angola). As a next step, these should be updated in the relevant map template used in pushpin maps for Angola (Angola#Africa). The articles of municipalities (município) or their possible subdivisions (comuna), including cities, towns and other populated places, typically use these pushpin maps. Then, the maps showing the location of each province (c:Category:SVG locator maps of provinces in Angola (location map scheme)), should be updated, to reflect the new administrative division. It has already entered into force in principle, although the change will be implemented gradually over the period 2025-2027. If possible, consider creating 1-2 maps also in the c:Category:SVG labeled maps of administrative divisions of Angola (location map scheme)? At some point, also the Angola map covering the 326 municipalities could be generated, but I think this is not the most urgent issue.

BR, -- Paju~enwiki (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

References

Discussion

Hi. I was just wondering if there were an easy way to get current administrative borders.. But e.g. website https://www.topogis-ao.com/arquivos-sig-e-cad seems to have shapefiles of the old DPA division of Angola, the new is not yet there... This website suggests, that their data originated from: (Portuguese: Ministério da Administração do Território). Perhaps someone who speaks Portuguese could contact the ministry and ask for an update? It would be also in their interest that Wikipedia updates the maps of Angola.

On the same occasion, it is definitely worth asking what the ministry considers to be the area of each province in square kilometres (and as a check, ask for the total area of the state). The argument could be that numerous official websites (such as https://governo.gov.ao/angola/provincias, and the provincial websites linked to it) currently have incorrect information about the area of many provinces even before the new political-administrative division.

However, I think the correct data could be requested directly from the national geodetic institute. In Angola the national geodetic (mapping research) institute is (Portuguese: Instituto Geográfico e Cadastral de Angola, IGCA, https://www.igca.gov.ao/; earlier also Portuguese: Instituto Geodesía e Cartografia de Angola, per https://www.igca.gov.ao/historia). It works under the Ministry of Planning, Urbanism, and Construction (Portuguese: Ministério das Obras Públicas, Urbanismo e Habitação, MINOPUH, https://minopuh.gov.ao/). I currently cannot access e.g. ESRI ArcGIS license which I could use for free commercial purposes, so I request that somebody else could do this... --Paju~enwiki (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

As no response came here, this request was sent to Commons User:NordNordWest. --Paju~enwiki (talk) 02:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

User:NordNordWest has made the requested updates. User:NordNordWest even updated the new maps in numerous Wikipedia projects. Fantastic! Should we mark this as Done? --Paju~enwiki (talk) 00:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Maps of "His Majesty's dominions" and the "British possessions"

• 
  Map of His Majesty's dominions
• 
  Map of the British possessions

Article(s)

British possession

Request

Please create maps of the countries encompassed in the legal definition of "His Majesty's dominions" and "British possessions". The former definition (not to be confused with the much more restrictive historical definition of a "Dominion") is everywhere where the British monarch is head of state: the Commonwealth realms, the Crown Dependencies, the British Overseas Territories, and all the dependent territories of countries like Australia and New Zealand (including their respective Antarctic claims). The latter definition is almost the same but does not include the UK (Great Britain and Northern Ireland) itself. Neither definition includes Barbados, so the map should be dated after 2022, when that country abolished its monarch and became a republic. Both maps should include the boundaries of Canadian provinces and Australian states.

I tried to do this myself but I found that I wasn't able to because the maps from which I tried to work (File:BlankMap-World.svg and File:Blank Map World Secondary Political Divisions.svg) seemed to be missing some territories; the former seems to be missing the British Indian Ocean Territory and the latter seems to be missing Bermuda. One of them (I forgot which) is also missing the Australian dependency of Christmas Island and possibly others. The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 22:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

I am pinging FAO users who made made changes to either File:BlankMap-World.svg and File:Blank Map World Secondary Political Divisions.svg and whose accounts were active recently (2025):

@Ninjatacoshell, ASDFGH, Raphaël Dunant, Abbasi786786, Betseg, ClaveScottPH, Canuckguy, AzaToth, H2g2bob, Lokal Profil, Ketiltrout, Yug, Holly Cheng, Fibonacci, Anomie, Chipmunkdavis, Spesh531, U003F, L.tak, Michaelwuzthere, Denniss, Bobrayner, Carnby, Kingofthedead, Χ, Alexander Roumega, Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson, Cherkash, Dim Grits, Viva Nicolás, Ythlev, Getsnoopy, Kashmiri, Akeosnhaoe, Heitordp, and EnronEvolved: The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Discussion

File:BlankMap-World.svg does have all the territories that you mentioned, they are just very small. This file is supposed to be edited as text. Open it with a text editor and see the examples above the tag </style>. Use ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 codes. For example, to color Bermuda, British Indian Ocean Territory and Christmas Island in red, add this line there:

.bm,.io,.cx {fill:#FF0000}

To also make their circles visible:

.bm,.io,.cx {fill:#FF0000; opacity:1}

You can also change the opacity value to a number between 0 and 1, such as 0.5, to make the circle transparent.

But this file doesn't have Akrotiri and Dhekelia or individual Antarctic territories. So I suggest using File:World map configurable.svg, which has many options to show these and other disputed territories, and to separate the 4 UK countries if desired. Open it with a text editor and follow the instructions there. If you also want to add borders of subdivisions of Australia and Canada, I suggest copying the relevant portions from this file.

If you find this too complicated, I can do it. Let me know what borders and what circles to show, and what colors to use. Heitordp (talk) 23:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@Heitordp I've done them, including Australian states and Canadian provinces. There are some problems showing Australian Antarctic Territory in World map configurable.svg.-- Carnby (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Set .aqau1 {display:yes}, then .aqau {fill:#...}. Or set .aqau1 {display:none}, .aqau2 (display:yes}, then .au {fill:#...} includes the Australian Antarctic Territory with Australia. Either way works. Heitordp (talk) 02:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done criticism is welcome.-- Carnby (talk) 06:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much @Carnby for doing these, they look excellent! Thank you also @Heitordp for the instructions. I tried to follow them and got as far as the issue with the Australian Antarctic Territory in World map configurable.svg. I came here for help and found Carnby had pre-empted me! I have some issues with the maps at present:

1. the grey circles are unnecessary and somewhat distracting (particularly in the Caribbean and Cyprus but also in the oceans).
2. while the red shading is traditional, ideally the shading colour should be the same green as used in typical grey-green maps used in Wikipedia: shading #346733 and borders #335033 – as recommended by the conventions for grey–green orthographic maps (perhaps the Antarctic territories should also be #49C946 as recommended there for "claimed uncontrolled areas").
3. the borders of borders of other countries' claims in the Antarctic should be removed where they run through the British, Australian, and New Zealand territories there – at present they look as though they indicate separate jurisdictions within those territories rather than overlapping claims that are not relevant here.
4. the circles in the Channel Islands are too many – the two bailiwicks of Jersey and Guernsey should be indicated and the other islands considered part of those two jurisdictions.

Please remove the grey circles, change the shading and border colours, remove the confusing lines in Antarctica, and remove the circles for Channel Islands other than Guernsey and Jersey. I will anyway add the relevant map to British possession at once, as these issues are only cosmetic. Thanks to you both again! The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Incidentally, I notice that the related maps File:Commonwealth realms map.svg and File:British Empire in February 1952.svg do not mark the Antarctic territories, despite claiming to represent the dependent territories. with particular colours. Perhaps someone has time to correct this? The February 1952 map's omission of Antarctic territories is particularly significant, as the the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 was still in the future and the Hope Bay incident took place in that very month. The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

@Heitordp@The wisest fool in Christendom

•  Done removed grey circles;
•  Done removed additional Channel Islands;
•  ToDo colour scheme: I'm not sure it would be right to choose conventions for grey–green orthographic maps for a world map; that should be discussed;
•  ToDo British Antarctic Territory: I don't know how to remove the lines.

-- Carnby (talk) 19:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

I made several adjustments:

• Replaced areas of subdivisions of Australia and Canada with one area for each whole country, and added borders of these subdivisions. It's not necessary to define areas of individual subdivisions if they will all be shown in the same color, and the borders are much more visible if defined as borders rather than a byproduct of adjacent areas. This also shortens the code.
• Adjusted disputed areas as recognized by the UK or de facto. File:World map configurable.svg is a template that shows all disputed areas separately by default, but any maps derived from this template should adjust how they are shown. These adjustments are made by setting the display property to yes or none for each disputed area in the top section of the file.
• Corrected Antarctic claims. The proper way to display the desired claims is to set their corresponding display properties in the top section, then color them with the corresponding codes. For example, this map is supposed to show only the British, Australian and New Zealand claims, so only .aqgb1, .aqau1 or .aqau2, and .aqnz1 should be set to yes, while the codes of all other claims should be set to none. Then set .aqgb, .aqau and .aqnz (or the respective codes of the countries including all territories: .gbt, .au, .nzt) to the desired color. There is no need to define colors of overlapping claims like .aqclgb unless the goal is to show these portions in a different color. Also note that the codes with numbers like .aqgb1 should only be used to set the display property; the codes to define colors are without numbers, like .aqgb. Using the codes with numbers to define colors results in coloring an incorrect part of the map.
• Moved the opacity property to the first definition of the codes of circles, instead of defining them again.
• Ajusted the positions of some circles to better match their islands like Anguilla. File:World map configurable.svg puts some circles farther from the islands to avoid overlapping circles of nearby islands. But if the map only shows a few circles, in this case only British territories, the circles can be placed more appropriately.
• Since the circles of Alderney and Sark were removed because they are part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, I also removed the circles of Ascension Island and Tristan da Cunha because they are part of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha. I also removed the circles of Australian islands because they are considered part of Australia rather than autonomous territories. But others may prefer to show these circles for clarity because they are far from the respective territory, unlike Guernsey. Heitordp (talk) 02:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

@Heitordp Very good work! Perhaps would be good to write <title>Guernsey (including Alderney and Sark)</title> and <title>Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha</title>? As far as the Australian islands are concerned, what about a very small circle?-- Carnby (talk) 07:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

@Heitordp Please do show the separate states and provinces for Australia and Canada, as there is a particular reason why these should be shown as separate – the definition of a British possession explicitly mentions areas controlled by local legislatures. The Interpretation Acts of 1889 and 1978 mention "where parts of such dominions are under both a central and a local legislature" and Halsbury's Laws explains that

When parts of such dominions are under both a central and a local legislature, all parts under the central legislature are deemed to be one British possession. But this principle applies only to matters falling within the authority of the central legislature.

The Evidence (Colonial Statutes) Act 1907 includes "component parts of a federation, such as the Canadian Provinces and the Australian States". Please add back in the states and provinces. I would also prefer to see the Australian dependencies treated the same way as the British and New Zealand dependencies: with their own circles. These territories are sometimes considered separate from Australia, as in the now-infamous case of the special American tariff regime for the territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands.These dependencies have their own governance structures for certain purposes, so they can for such purposes be considered British possessions. There is also the practical issue that they are near invisible without the circles. This is also true of Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, which unlike the Channel Islands are nowhere near St Helena's circle. Thank you for re-centring the other circles.

@Carnby The green and grey colour scheme applies not only to orthographic maps, but is relatively standard for Wikimedia locator maps in general. The bright red currently used is to my mind out of place among such maps as are found in Commons:Category:Locator maps (gray and green scheme). The green-on-grey-and-white is easier to read than the red-on-grey-and-white. The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

@The wisest fool in Christendom: Thank you for the explanation. I made several adjustments again:

• Separated subdivisions of Australia and Canada, as requested. Their borders became more visible, and the tooltips show the names of the subdivisions instead of the whole country.
• Restored circles for external territories of Australia, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, as requested.
• Added circles for Australian Capital Territory, Jervis Bay Territory and Prince Edward Island.
• Since Alderney and Sark also have their own legislatures, I think that they should also count as separate possessions, similar to the subdivisions of Australia and Canada. So I restored their circles, but adjusted their positions with overlaps to avoid occupying an excessive area.
• Adjusted positions of circles in the Caribbean and Cyprus to become more centered on the respective territories, with overlaps.
• Used lighter color for Antarctic claims.

I tried the green color scheme of orthographic maps, but the circles looked almost gray and difficult to identify. I prefer the red color because it provides more contrast. Heitordp (talk) 03:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Heitordp! I realized belatedly that the previous version did not remove the internal borders of Australia and Canada entirely, but they did become more difficult to see at certain zoom levels. Now they seem much clearer. I'm still not convinced of the necessity of having more than two circles for the Channel Islands and for the "mainland" territories of Canada and Australia (PEI, ACT, Jervis Bay) since they're so close to one another, but I'm happy that the dependent archipelagos are all individually marked. Could you perhaps upload a separate green-grey version for each map? I tried modifying the files myself using that colour scheme but the supernumerary grey circles reappeared! The red colour, in my opinion, looks good for the landmasses but the paler pink on the white ocean is not as clear. The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 17:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

@The wisest fool in Christendom: I removed the circles of Alderney, Sark, Australian Capital Territory, Jervis Bay Territory and Prince Edward Island.

The additional gray circles appear if you open the file with Inkscape, because it shows all hidden objects. As noted on the wiki file page, please do not edit this file with Inkscape, because it disrupts the structure and adds a lot of unnecessary code. To change the colors, open the file with a text editor and search for the lines that contain #CC3333 (main territories) and #FF8888 (Antarctic territories). Change these color codes as you wish (such as #346733 and #49C946), save the file, then open it with a browser to see how it looks.

By "paler pink on the white ocean", do you mean the color inside the circles? The circles are actually defined with the same color as land, but with an opacity property (currently 0.5) to make them partially transparent, to allow seeing the islands inside them. If you don't want this transparency, change the opacity to 1 (in 6 instances). Heitordp (talk) 05:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, the circles in the sea appear pink because of their translucence. Thank you for your help in this. The wisest fool in Christendom (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Locations of Hwanhaejangseong fortress on Jeju

Description of the image

• 
  Satellite image of Jeju
• 
  Svg blank map

Article(s)

Drafting an article on Hwanhaejangseong

Request

Hello everyone, I was wondering if someone could make a quick map pinpointing the locations of the protected parts of the Hwanhaejangseong fortress on Jeju Province/Jeju Island. I don't have a particular preference for the base map, I put a (very nice public domain) satellite image and an svg blank map above, but if it's easier to generate something with coordinates anew that would be fine. I'm just looking for a reader to be able to see where the protected portions of the remaining wall are on the island at a glance. I've put both the addresses from a source and coordinates taken from ko.wiki in the table just in case one is better than the other, although I assume coordinates would be easier to work from. I'm not looking for labels either, I doubt they'd fit well in the map. Thanks, CMD (talk) 04:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Places needing marks

No.	Location	Korean Addresses from page 140	Address translation	Coordinates (from ko.wiki)
1	Gonneuldong	제주시 화북일동 4373	4373 Hwabuk 1(il)-dong, Jeju City	33°31′28″ N 126°33′35″ E
2	Byeoldo	제주시 화북일동 1533-4	1533-4 Hwabuk 1(il)-dong, Jeju City	33°31′36″ N 126°34′07″ E
3	Samyang	제주시 삼양3동 2622-1	2622-1 Samyang 3(sam)-dong, Jeju City	33°31′39″ N 126°34′33″ E
4	Aewol	제주시 애월읍 애월리 1957-1	1957-1 Aewol-ri, Aewol-eup, Jeju City	33°28′06″ N 126°18′47″ E
5	Bukchon	제주시 조천읍 북촌리 393-3	393-3 Bukchon-ri, Jocheon-eup, Jeju City	33°33′09″ N 126°42′04″ E
6	Dongbok	제주시 구좌읍 동복리 687-5	687-5 Dongbok-ri, Gujwa-eup, Jeju City	33°33′21.8″ N 126°43′08″ E
7	Haengwon	제주시 구좌읍 행원리 산2번지	Lot San 2, Haengwon-ri, Gujwa-eup, Jeju City	33°33′27.7″ N 126°48′35.1″ E
8	Handong	제주시 구좌읍 한동리 1690	1690 Handong-ri, Gujwa-eup, Jeju City	33°33′01.1″ N 126°49′42.5″ E
9	Onpyeong	제주시 성산읍 환해장성로 732	732 Hwanhaejangseong-ro, Seongsan-eup, Jeju City	33°25′02″ N 126°54′25″ E
10	Sinsan	제주시 성산읍 신산리 49-5	49-5 Sinsan-ri, Seongsan-eup, Jeju City	33°23′18″ N 126°53′33″ E

Discussion

A tweak to the Punic Wars map gif

Article(s)

Punic Wars

Request

I would like there to be a version of this map - File:Domain changes during the Punic Wars.gif - which does not have a minus sign in front of each of the dates in the bottom left corner, but does have " BC" after each. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Discussion

 Comment: Just to note there is a difference of one year between the astronomical date (-264) and Julian/Gregorian calendar (263 BC). Carnby (talk) 08:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

True, but whoever created this map ignored that. The numbers would be correct if "BC" were added. Not "BCE" please. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

@Gog the Mild

Check whether the dates are right.-- Carnby (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

That looks great. One date needs tweaking - could "202 BC" be changed to 201 BC. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Clownfish distribution map

Article(s)

Clownfish

Request

I would like a replication of the map in figure 1 of The radiation of the clownfishes has two geographical replicates. The article can be downloaded here. Thank you. LittleJerry (talk) 00:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Discussion

Translate the key to English?

• 
  A map of Scipio Africanus's African campaign

Article(s)

Punic Wars

Request

I would like just the key to be translated into English. Thanks Gog the Mild (talk) 16:10, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Discussion