Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Tripura
![]() | Points of interest related to Tripura on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Category – WikiProject – Deletions |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Tripura. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Tripura|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Tripura. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

watch |
Articles for deletion
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Electoral history of Jitendra Chaudhury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, not a notable national-level leader, detailed history is already merged with the article Jitendra Chaudhury. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 00:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 13. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, History, Lists, and Tripura. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Duplicate of content at Jitendra Chaudhury#Electoral history. No need for separate article. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree with Obi2canibe, already includes in electoral history of Jitendra Chaudhury, not need to have separate article for it. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG Iban14mxl (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Northeast India International Travel Mart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Is clearly WP:PROMO. Little to know sources talking about it. Fails WP:GNG and all of the sources are press releases Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Travel and tourism, India, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:08, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment:An editor had edited a name change on the article and broken the link to this AFD. Ihave restored that and am adding a Findsources for the alternate name here. AllyD (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for the inconvenience. I was just looking at the article as someone mentioned it on my talk page. The article title itself is incorrect, but after a Google search, I found several notable sources for the topic, and I have added some of them, including rewriting some parts. Aryan{Talk} 23:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- It’s still primary sources or passing mentions. Primary sources do not qualify as reliable sources. Press releases and media outlets just repeating the press release do not count. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry for the inconvenience. I was just looking at the article as someone mentioned it on my talk page. The article title itself is incorrect, but after a Google search, I found several notable sources for the topic, and I have added some of them, including rewriting some parts. Aryan{Talk} 23:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Kudos to AllyD for fixing the broken AfD link.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: This has been going around the relist circuit for some weeks with little input. So, let's seek a creative consensus... The current article is doing little beyond listing the annual occurrences of a marketing event, supported by PR sourced coverage; I am not seeing the critical coverage needed to demonstrate notability in its own right. However, in the wider context, we also have a Tourism in Northeast India article which does little beyond listing the sights. So, would a reasonable outcome be to move the first paragraph of this article into a International Tourism Mart section in the other article, giving some improvement there, and reduce the present article to a redirect? AllyD (talk) 07:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hey firstly thanks for fixing the broken AfD link. Well I get what you mean but I’m totally against even using the content for the other wiki page, since the content here are all primary sources. The other sources that are not press releases also seem to be written with an overly promotional tone and we might be in WP:NEWSORGINDIA waters. A redirect would thus not make sense. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 23:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - This article does not meet WP:GNG because the topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The sources available on the topic are primary sources or passing mentions. - tucoxn\talk 14:46, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.