Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pi network Project

Pi network Project

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cryptocurrency project. Electricmemory (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes I support this project it shouldn't be deleted 2409:408A:3E39:EB4D:0:0:2DCB:3218 (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that 2409:408A:3E39:EB4D:0:0:2DCB:3218 (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes I support Pi network it should not be deleted.its a wonderful project 103.100.17.16 (talk) 04:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that 103.100.17.16 (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Most, if not all, references fail WP:SIRS. UtherSRG (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG - David Gerard (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stay, as the article is not a promotion and it is reporting a project where 60 millions users participated and either it suceeds or fails it deserves a reporting for the history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarek1984 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Stay" isn't a standard !vote. You may want to read about contributing to AfD discussions. And while you are doing that, read WP:NCORP and WP:GNG, our policies on notability which govern what is acceptable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors 130.225.198.177 (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this source that's already in the article might be borderline WP:SIRS, but I can't find any other sources that are clearly reliable and contain significant coverage. The article in its current state is AI-generated garbage and the second half almost makes it an attack page (so the supporters being canvassed should want this article to be deleted). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]