Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data based decision making

Data based decision making

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear notable. Referenced to a very small number of academic papers from the mid to late 2000s/early 2010s, but I cursory searches don't lead me to any significant use of the term in the context of education. Article seems to be largely structured based on the ideas of the Bernhardt reference. I would assume these ideas were salient around the passage and initial implementation of the No Child Let Behind Act and not much beyond that. Maybe reduce to a paragraph or two and merge into the article for the law? William Graham ^talk 06:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. William Graham ^talk 06:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it was a buzz phrase in the 2010s and has become a cliché by now, used exclusively at professional development workshops by education professors and principals, and still not covered in reliable secondary sources. An article about a rare eye disease might have that problem, and I’d still vote for keeping it, but this was just invented one day - and won’t go away. There’s a guy on Instagram that satirizes this sort of academic educationalese: "Find your rigor. Let’s take a deep dive into the data. What does Charlotte Danielson say?" Bearian (talk) 05:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]