Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Golf

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Golf. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Golf|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Golf. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Sports.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Golf/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Golf

Articles for deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 17:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arabian Sea Country Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable place. No reliable sources. Just a golf course. Wikibear47 (talk) 16:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Golf and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No RS found on news search.--Gul Butt (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of good sources; appears to be one of thousands of ordinary country clubs. Bearian (talk) 09:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: cannot find any evidence (both webpages and news) to suggest that it is WP:NOTABLE or deserving of an encyclopaedia article. Only results were info pages about it, Tripadvisor etc. - seems to be just an ordinary country club - see WP:MILL. Molecular Pilot 09:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't look to meet WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I see no objection to the nomination. Owen× ☎ 18:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St Austell Golf Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline. None of the sources in the article are reliable or have significant coverage of the subject, and a quick look for more did not turn up anything promising. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Golf, and England. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be a good idea to increase the golf club articles on wikipedia so they match other sports like football? I know this is not the most notible example but it is the club I know most about. LeonKnight (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: some rule establishing equity along the lines of Title IX between the soccer and other sports would be nice to have, but IMHO another direction is beneficial (trimming the soccer). Викидим (talk) 05:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if newspapers circulating in Cornwall cover it it would be notable in mid Cornwall but that might not be enough for general notability. Perhaps a summary paragraph in St Austell would be enough.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 04:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Beyond the nominator, we don't have participants stating what should happen with THIS article that is being assessed and evaluated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]