Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Behavioural science

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Behavioural science. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Behavioural science|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Behavioural science. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Behavioural science/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Please be sure to follow the three basic steps when nominating an article for deletion. While not required, it is courteous to also notify interested people—such as those who created the article, or those who have contributed significant work to it. Thank you.

Behavioural science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of ASEAN countries by IQ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oh well. I don't want to reignite the old CTOP, but measures of intelligence across countries like this have always been controversial, if not fringe, and presenting a "list of countries by IQ" as a factual-looking article is probably not the best way to tackle it. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Behavioural science, Lists, and Asia. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm also concerned about there being some WP:FRINGE in this article because IQ tests and their accuracy are debated and there may have been many different factors in how the countries determined the average IQs of their citizens, which might make the comparison between them inaccurate. I also don't think that this meets WP:GNG because there really isn't any significant coverage of the average IQ in countries in ASEAN specifically; all of the data is taken from lists of the average IQ in countries around the world. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 00:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This definitely isn't a type of article that we should be encouraging, and the major source in the article, [1], is selling stuff, which is a disqualifier for the numbers presented here. Nate • (chatter) 01:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Jeez, this article is one of the worst ideas I've seen on Wikipedia, and in 20 years I've seen many. It's basically a collection of numbers of near-zero scientific value that seems of use only for "scientific racism" forums. There might be some value in collecting this information if presented with a lot of context on IQ tests, but not as such a list.--cyclopia ^speak! 14:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not the type of content that should be encouraged on Wikipedia. IQ is a shaky qualifier of intelligence as it is. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Source 2 is marginal per Source Highlighter, the rest aren't rated, appearing to be databases. Most people won't even undergo the test, so I'm not sure how this is a fair assessment of the situation. Doesn't seem notable/somewhat unscientific. Oaktree b (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is embarrassing. – ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't even have a source on the supposed article topic. CMD (talk) 07:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I think this is a stupid concept. "IQ of nations" is something only a very fringe subset of people care about. In addition to this, the average IQ of ASEAN countries isn't something well documented or scientific. -Samoht27 (talk) 04:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Behavioural science proposed deletions