Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambalache Interface Designer

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aoidh (talk | contribs) at 20:28, 24 September 2024 (Delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cambalache Interface Designer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Cambalache Interface Designer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV sources given is a primary source Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some secondary sources Wiktorpyk (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Miminity. Just wanted to check if the secondary sources I added are enough to address the concerns? Wiktorpyk (talk) 10:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but, some of the sources you provided are questionable in terms of reliability. See WP:PRS to see what's some of the reliable sources But again I cannot determine them at my own but some sources you added seems like a WP:USERGEN. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for the Redirect suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject should be listed to a stub for expansion, passes WP:NotableTesleemah 08:05,23 September 2024 (UTC)

@Tesleemah:, as I said it lacks significant coverage for reliable sources per WP:GNG secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. Google News yields one result from a questionable source (here). The sources provides is primary. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT / WP:PRODUCT. None of the sources in the article show or contribute to notability in any way:

Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
No This is a conference talk by the developer of the software ~ ✘ No
No A self-published guide on GitHub. ~ ✘ No
No Press release No Press release ✘ No
No Churnalism: Almost verbatim copy of the press release above. No ✘ No
~ All content is copied from project ~ No It is a bare database entry with no context or analysis of content ✘ No
No You pay to have content published on the site. No No ✘ No
No Developer's blog ✘ No
No Developer's blog ✘ No
No Developer's blog ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Searching online I found press releases and forum discussions/repository entries showing that it does indeed exist and is used, but nothing that would contribute to the notability of the article's subject on Wikipedia at this time. - Aoidh (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cambalache_Interface_Designer&oldid=1247553746"