Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinuxForums.org

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Mentions in Google Books seem to be trivial and not significant coverage. I can only find one source, and that's only about a data breach. I doubt one article about a data breach that happened to a website makes it notable. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Websites. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A product of the times when notability guidelines was lax, no source for it either. Non-notable like most forums. SpacedFarmer (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable due to no significant coverage - WP:GNG. Only found an outdated post on a Wikia/"Fandom" page and a reddit article. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree, not seeing much by way of sources. No results in my newspapers.com search and basically nothing of quality in the first few pages of Google search. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article's subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. I also could only find trivial coverage of the article's subject. - Aoidh (talk) 04:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, and a Google search only shows trivial mentions of the site. There is also only one reference in the article which is something about a data breach. FlutterDash344 (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]