Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FTP Commander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FTP Commander

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no source in the article, and no source that meets the notability requirements can be found. The article does not meet Wikipedia notability . 日期20220626 (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Advertising blurbs from the software company still exist all of these years later, but there's pretty much zero independent documentation that isn't just a directory listing with a company URL in a list of "Here's where you can get FTP clients." I thought that I had found a book with a non-directory treatment, but upon reaading it turned out to be 2 sentences: It's like other FTP clients; and it's for Windows. So I'm not finding in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources, either.
Deleted edits here and at InternetSoft Corporation lead me to think that there was probably a conflict of interest in this article's creation, too, disguised by picking a new username in 2007 and trying again.
Uncle G (talk) 05:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG. A search revealed the sources discussed by the nominator, enough for a merge if there was a suitable target, but as it stands there does not seem to be an WP:ATD. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.