Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechExcel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:49, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 20:49, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TechExcel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blatant advertisement for subject; rather surprising that CSD G11 was declined -- Gmatsuda (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pretty much sounds like it was pasted directly from an adverising brochure, with phrases like "TechExcel ServiceWise is your comprehensive internal help desk and IT service management solution regardless of how simple or complex your business processes may be." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pure marketing-speak spam. JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite - the company seems notable and verifiable through media coverage. However, the article itself is written as an advertizement. This isn't a good reason to delete the article. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - 68.183.55.64 (talk) 09:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.