Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Akers
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:41, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 05:41, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Footballers' Wives: Extra Time. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 16:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Courtney Akers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is currently an unreferenced BLP. A search for sources revealed an IMDB entry and a few trivial mentions in references of similar quality, but no significant coverage in reliable sources that would show notability. Peter Karlsen (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Kudpung (talk) 10:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Kudpung (talk) 10:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Kudpung (talk) 10:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Footballers' Wives: Extra Time as a reasonable search term to the series for which she has whatever note she might. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per the above. That's probably the best option; notability is limited otherwise. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.