Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fortra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND. References are press-releases, PR and routine coverage. Advert by a now blocked undeclared paid editor. scope_creepTalk 13:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Minnesota. Shellwood (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete plenty of coverage, but it's all about business transactions (buying another company, releasing a product). Nothing substantive about the company itself. Oaktree b (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NCORP, WP:PROMO, and per nom - spotchecking sources such as the frequently-cited IT Jungle blog shows churnalism of promotional announcements of routine business transactions that provide insufficient WP:CORPDEPTH and fail WP:ORGIND, and results in an article that reads like a press release with extra puffery in the lead that is unsupported by the source. Beccaynr (talk) 18:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.