Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SyncThink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SyncThink

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undisclosed paid article for a non-notable corporation. This page was originally a disambiguation page at Szepesi (which I have restored) that Oknfj hijacked in August 2016 to avoid the scrutiny of new page patrollers. After clearing out the junk, I discovered that there was only one reliable source covering this company in any significant detail, and my internet search failed to find anything else, so I'm nominating it for deletion. The product is IMO not notable either, although you could maybe argue that it was if you were really determined to (given the circumstances, I am not). —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 16:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 16:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SERIESA. FalconK (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this barely-sourced ad. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 19:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.