Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpectroCoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SpectroCoin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ALthough supported by many refs, none appear to convey any notability and all are from a very niche interest group. This appears to be just one of very many similar organisations and it currently fails to meet WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As of now I must support deletion; most if not all of the sources given are associated with the company making this app, being either their website, press releases, or trade magazine "interviews" which are little more than press releases in a different format. All the sources do is indicate that this product/company exists, which does not meet notability guidelines. 331dot (talk) 13:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found links at News, browsers and Highbeam but certainly nothing for a considerably better notable and improvable article. Notifying tagger 331dot. SwisterTwister talk 06:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.