Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumerization of applications
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:41, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 04:41, 12 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Consumerization. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Consumerization of applications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is nothing more than a dictionary definition of a term that is used widely in the IT industry, but with widely varying meanings depending on the context. No verification can be found for the author's claim that he invented the term. PROD declined by author. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to consumerization Mangoe (talk) 15:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I agree with Mangoe's idea. Had I known that the Consumerization article existed, I would have simply proceeded with the redirect. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to consumerization, as above. This is currently an unreferenced stub. Dialectric (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.