Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chubebabe Language
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:52, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 05:52, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G3 as a blatant hoax. —Angr (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chubebabe Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claims to be a language with over 98 million speakers in Somalia - but has no references or Google sources to back it up at all. Fails WP:RS and is created by a single use account - Chubebabe685 (talk · contribs) Google search. Delete. Some Wiki Editor (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is something made up one day. It is so patently ridiculous that it does not even qualify as a hoax. The Ethnologue has no record of this and there is no such thing as the "Afro-Scandinavian" language family. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - Unless there is some terrible misspelling, this article seems to be a hoax. Rotmo (talk) 06:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.