Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rajesh84Kumar (talk | contribs) at 09:48, 20 January 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


January 14

03:34:49, 14 January 2021 review of draft by TechJourno


Hi. I created a stub for “Synnex Technology International Corporation” a couple of months back, and it’s been rejected. I’m new to Wikipedia and I’m having trouble understanding what I’ve done wrong. When I look at the draft there’s a reference to WP:NCOMPANY, which I think means that the company isn’t significant … even though it’s listed on the stock exchange? There’s also a note that says that the submission is blank? Any suggestions/help would be appreciated!

TechJourno (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TechJourno. In Articles for creation parlance, the draft has been declined (which allows improvement and re-submission), not rejected (which is final, not allowing re-submission). Being listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange is encouraging, but, according to the WP:LISTED section of WP:NCOMPANY, is not sufficient on its own to demonstrate notability. The draft needs several independent, reliable sources that are deeper than a listing, passing mention, or routine news. Simplywall.st doesn't have the necessary reputation for accuracy and fact checking to make it a reliable source, but that is the depth of coverage to look for - only in quality media like The South China Morning Post, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Wall Street Journal, etc. Wikipedia already has several possibly-related poor quality articles: MiTAC, MiTAC Holdings, and MiTAC Computing Technology Corp.. You might find it easier, and more beneficial to the encyclopedia, to improve an existing article than to start a new one from scratch. The relationships among the various companies certainly needs clarification. Even if they are separate legal entities, that may not mean they are best treated in separate stand alone articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:59:39, 14 January 2021 review of draft by Aslan110


Hi,

I created a submission that's been declined on Jan.4 by user Curbon7 - I've asked him to give me more details on his talk page but he's not responded so far, which is why I'm seeking more advice here

I'd just like to understand why it's not admissible

1. The page is a translation from the french wikipedia, where it already exists (I also wrote the french version). Is it possible that one page is admissible in & language and not admissible in another ? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C3%ABl_P%C3%A9neau

2. Some of The criterias for music composers/performers (according to the guidelines) seem to apply :

- criteria #4 : Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country

- criteria #10 : Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.

- criteria #1 : Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

Could you please let me know as to why these criterias are not sufficient ?

Also, I found a number of similar pages related to techno producers and DJs (some with less relevant sources than the ones I used for this page) so I'm wondering why these pages have been deemed admissible but not the one I've submitted : - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Servant - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hacker - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVS1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aslan110 (talk • contribs) 08:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks,


Aslan110 (talk) 07:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:51:41, 14 January 2021 review of draft by SztolpenOS


Hello, I'd like to ask you for some tips while writing an article about the company [Sunreef Yachts]. First draft was declined and I've already corrected it, but if you have any advise for me how I can improve the text I'll be grateful for that.

Additionally, how long does it take to submit the corrected article again? How many times I can correct the article? Many thanks!

SztolpenOS (talk) 08:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:50, 14 January 2021 review of submission by Francisjk2020

Please take a look at the revised draft. Need changes have been made, sources and citations added. All the faults points out by the reviewers have been corrrected. (Francisjk2020 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)) Francisjk2020 (talk) 09:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:19:38, 14 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Artemenkov


Dear Wikipedia Editors, I was meaning to write a bio article for Russian Wikipedia, but in my inexperience ended submitting it to English Wikipedia, as I didn't know that the firm barriers between the two Wikipedia's exist. So it was declined for English Wikepedia and I was suggested by the editor to transfer it to the Russian Wikipedia , but I don't know how to effect this transfer, what shall I do to transfer my page with the code into the Russian Wikipedia? Thanks for assisting me!

Artemenkov (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Artemenkov: is 109.248.220.245 also you? Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:36:51, 14 January 2021 review of submission by Darzubair

This personal is the notable football coach of All india football Federation (AIFF) and is a Professional licensed coach under Asian football federation. Help me in getting this page verified

Darzubair (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:51:48, 14 January 2021 review of submission by Nboni1

I have update this page with links and images to highlight the relevance to the wider wikipedia community as a star of a national TV show i believe that Liv Burt should have a page. Nboni1 (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help me get this published ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chef_Liv_Burt Nboni1 (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nboni1 The draft has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. The person does not meet the notability criteria. 331dot (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:14:52, 14 January 2021 review of submission by KentuckyGeneral2000


KentuckyGeneral2000 (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KentuckyGeneral2000 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 18:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:00:56, 14 January 2021 review of submission by 103.211.52.64


103.211.52.64 (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


21:34:49, 14 January 2021 review of submission by DavidPlayzYT

This movie is not publicly famous, but I do think any movie should have a wikipedia page. DavidPlayzYT (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidPlayzYT: no. Any movie shouldn't have a wikipedia page if they aren't covered significantly by published, reliable, independent media. Thank you! :) MarioJump83! 02:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:24:53, 14 January 2021 review of submission by LinneaReilly


I took out all the sales copy. I wrote a DREXSPORT article (in review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Drexsport), and Wild Muscle and Wild Whey are DREXSPORT products. I simply identified them as DREXSORT protein supplements. LinneaReilly (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


22:25:47, 14 January 2021 review of draft by Austinkocher


I am attempting to submit a new page for an educational research institution here (Draft:Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC)). However, the page has been rejected twice for the reason that it does not have sufficient independent resources showing relevance. I don't understand how to correct this since I have included 20 references so far to TRAC being used by national outlets ranging from the New York Times to Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. What am I missing? I would greatly appreciate any clarification you can provide.

Austinkocher (talk) 22:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already answered at the Teahouse. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:33:11, 14 January 2021 review of draft by EditorCTD


I am trying to publish a Wikipedia page for Country Travel Discoveries the company that I work for. It has not been accepted and I need help editing it so it will be accepted. EditorCTD (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 15

06:58:07, 15 January 2021 review of submission by The coolest lynn

because i want to know everyone that they know about their computer The coolest lynn (talk) 06:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The coolest lynn We already have an article about megabyte, please look at it and take note of what we expect an article to look like. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:32, 15 January 2021 review of submission by Karthik Shankar P S


Hey there, my page submission was rejected as stated - This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. I have added links of articles of the said person in magazines like Forbes. Would like to know what and how I can get this done.

Karthik Shankar P S (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources need to be independent of him, NOT written by him. Theroadislong (talk) 08:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:34:35, 15 January 2021 review of submission by Pishai Allan Muchauraya

why my article was declined Pishai Allan Muchauraya (talk) 14:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pishai Allan Muchauraya Your article was a call for investment. It is not an encyclopedia article and is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. This is the wrong platform. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:52:27, 15 January 2021 review of submission by Phoenix-anna


Phoenix-anna (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Phoenix-anna/sandbox/Hexagon_Qualcomm

I received feedback that my article was too informal and a link that took me to two options: summary style and inverted pyramid style. I would like clarification on what are the issues with the style. HOw is it "informal"? Should it be converted to one of the two options - summary style or informal style? If so, which one?

This article is intended to be a replacement for the existing article on Qualcomm Hexagon

You can edit the actual article here Qualcomm Hexagon we don't "replace" articles. Theroadislong (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:04:04, 15 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Kashmir987


I have Written article on a journalist who is famous and well known and is only Bollywood beat Journalist of Jammu and Kashmir. I have also attached links but unfortunately got rejected after submission. Kindly help


Kashmir987 (talk) 15:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kashmir987: You need multiple independent sources to demonstrate notability. The few references there now all appear to be copies of the same article. There isn't anything there now that suggests the subject is notable enough. The draft has been tagged for speedy deletion (not by me). TechnoTalk (talk) 23:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:33:28, 15 January 2021 review of draft by Edward Myer


Rejection of article and constantly being solicited by reviewers that they can make my for the Draft:Bruse_Wane live if I Pay. I have be constantly contacted by editors assuming I'm the artist I have written about at the e-mail associated with my account. These editors, reviewers, gatekeeps etc on wikipedia keep telling me to pay and they can get the draft for Bruse_Wane rapper approved. It has come to my attention wikipedia is a for profit tool, and scam house for editors. People that deserve to be on here won't be added unless they pay. Wikipedia is not legitimate. It's assume that wikipedia have become one big for profit scam house. I will do my unrelenting best to let the world know about this for buy shame wikipedia has become especially when relating to Hip Hop artist article submissions.

Edward Myer (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do give the names of reviewers who have solicited you please. Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Edward Myer Wikipedia does not charge or require payment for article creation or the acceptance of a draft. Third parties might offer paid editing as a service, and solicit people with it, but that is something that they do on their own without any official sanction. Those third parties can make no guarantees(such as writing an article that will not be deleted). 331dot (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Edward Myer, be wary of the following: Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning. Per Theroadislong, would you know the names of the editors who have contacted you? Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 16:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:08:15, 15 January 2021 review of submission by 103.211.18.38


103.211.18.38 (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was blatantly promotional in nature. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:14:34, 15 January 2021 review of submission by Rocleon

My article was declined. It tells it doesn't ave reliable sources. what reliable sources do I have to add. can anyone tell me that? Rocleon (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rocleon A subject merits a Wikipedia article if independent relible sources with significant coverage choose on their own to write about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability.(more specifically a notable company or a notable website) Reliable sources have a reputation of fact checking and editorial control. "Independent" means that press releases, brief mentions, announcements of routine business transactions, staff interviews, the company website, and other primary sources, are not acceptable for establishing notability. If Ayedot is not written about by independent reliable sources, it would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. Not every subject does, even within the same field.
Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about something. If you are associated with Ayedot, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on formal disclosures you may be required to make. 331dot (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:41:26, 15 January 2021 review of submission by Historyisnotajoke


Historyisnotajoke (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I checked wikipedia and very worst articles exist then our article, our article has proof and links so why you reject always?

WP:OSE Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Historyisnotajoke (edit conflict) If there are articles "worse" than what you wrote, please point them out so they can be addressed. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. We can only address what we know about- that does not mean new inappropriate content can be permitted. Please see other stuff exists for more information. If you work for this company, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing.
Your draft has no independent reliable sources to support its content and tell why this company meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:09:18, 15 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Jatin Vats JV



Jatin Vats JV (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:12:02, 15 January 2021 review of submission by Pcarlson99


Pcarlson99 (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Creating a basic wiki for my friend who is a twitch streamer, please publish! Pcarlson99 (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pcarlson99 In this context, one does not "create a wiki", as a wiki is a type of entire website of which Wikipedia is one example. You attempted to create a Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about someone. A Wikipedia article about a person summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. I'm guessing that there is no news coverage of your friend, or books written about them, or some such. If you just want to tell the world about this person, you should use social media or some alternative forum where that is permitted. 331dot (talk) 18:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:16:50, 15 January 2021 review of submission by DanielkHartness


Hey There! My article, Draft:June Foster, was rejected because I "they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)". While I was creating the article, I was really trying to follow those guidelines. To aid me, I referred to the pages of other authors, Celia Friedman and Bob Goff. I tried to model my article format off of theirs. I noticed on Friedman's page, an interview or two was cited, which lead me to linking to several different ones for June Foster. She's given near a dozen. Would those not be considered independent? I figured those might be considered objective coverage and unbiased in a sense. I also gave little biographical info, just trying to stick with her career, what she's known for, so it would be as objective as possible. I'm really not sure what other sources to use. I linked to sites showing her awards, books, and interviews, so I don't know exactly what I need. I felt like this article was similar enough to Celia Friedman and shows that she's an author with multiple books. Could you guys help me? I know I'm new, but I really want to contribute. I thought I found a good way with an author of several books. What source am I missing?

I was also able to find a link to her publisher, Winged Publications, would that help too?

Thanks so much and for the very quick review!

DanielkHartness (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielkHartness: Sorry your submission was rejected. It can be frustrating, but the issue is that the sourcing is poor, and doesn't establish the author's notability. There are a lot of other poor articles that were written when the standards were not as stringent for submission. There's an essay about this WP:OTHERSTUFF. Interviews are not considered reliable sources but they can show notability if they are notable publications. What you need are profiles of the author in independent sources, which can be used to create the biography. If you can add them, you're on your way to showing notability. If there aren't any, it's harder to show she deserves an article. Also, it's not going to change the need for proper sourcing, but you don't want to add inline external links to Amazon for all her books. See WP:EL. It becomes a spam opportunity, and gives the impression that you are trying to market her books. You want to instead source the books with coverage such as reviews in independent sources. Good luck. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TechnoTalk: Ok thanks for the help. I've found several bios I'll use as references instead and resubmit it! I added the publisher's bio of her too, and will fix the links for the books. Could I link the books to Google books instead? Or do I need a independent review of each one?

January 16

10:03:09, 16 January 2021 review of submission by Hit1985


Hit1985 (talk) 10:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


10:33:08, 16 January 2021 review of submission by 192.142.218.222

tell me the problems

192.142.218.222 (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft only tells of the existence of the company. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 11:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:53:34, 16 January 2021 review of submission by Ahmad Abazeed school

just don't.

Ahmad Abazeed school (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted on your user talk page, Wikipedia is free storage space. 331dot (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:24:39, 16 January 2021 review of draft by Taiwania Justo

This article is done by adding the related sources. Please check again, thanks! This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 13:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:16:58, 16 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 73.254.183.116


Hello! I received feedback that my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:M._Riad_El-Ghonemy is not acceptable. The reasons cited were not helpful, and I am reaching out here to get more specifics. I found the feedback generic and vague, and I am sure there is a lot of subjectivity in this discussion on what is 'significant' coverage and what is a 'reliable source' or 'The article needs independent sources: i.e. sources other than the subject's own works' -- that is where I need some help.

The article refers to multiple publications that are not by the subject, not published by the subject, and are reliable sources themselves. In addition the subject has written multiple published works with proven track records of applicability and which are referenced in the article. I am puzzled why the reviewer left this feedback, and could use some guidance beyond what is in the Talk page entry that I reviewed carefully for more specific examples of where the article references fell short.

Thanks for any guidance on this. Examples of similar individuals' biographical pages, particularly thought leaders who worked at the boundary of Non Governmental Organizations (e.g., UNDP) and academia, to help me see an example or precedent of an 'acceptable to Wikipedia' article.

I do see that the works cited are all by the subject -- if that is the chief issue, I will go look for other sources, however it is challenging some times to find that when the subject itself is a prodigious thinker or prolific author, as we depend on someone **else** writing about the subject, which biases against mavericks and thought leaders who may not have had that kind of coverage in their lifetimes.

73.254.183.116 (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:02:24, 16 January 2021 review of submission by Merabharatdesh


Merabharatdesh (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:25:21, 16 January 2021 review of submission by MattBiomathews


Can you please explain what notable is? what is required? I have been featured in news articles, podcasts, magazines, and TV. along with 12,000 followers on Facebook and 44,000 followers on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/matt_mathews/?hl=en https://www.facebook.com/MattMathewsPhotos

https://medium.com/authority-magazine/author-matt-mathews-on-how-to-learn-to-finally-love-yourself-dfe58a0835fb https://homebusinessmag.com/success-stories-lifestyles/tragedy-triumph-self-love-matt-mathews-beauty-boudoir/ https://mylalifestyle.com/treat-yourself-dont-cheat-yourself-self-care-secrets-from-matt-mathews/ https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/real-talk-with/episode-1-hot-mess-express-HmUxt1B8KDb/ https://www.cbs42.com/news/local/birmingham-boudoir-photographer-reveals-all-in-autobiography/ https://www.photographersedit.com/blog/boudoir-style/ https://blog.stickymarketingtools.com/matt-mathews-specializing-marketing-increasing-your-sales/ https://larousseshoppe.com/blogs/packaging-branding-inspiration/90571334-featured-photographer-matt-mathews

MattBiomathews (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your autobiographical draft had zero sources, the number of Facebook and Instagram followers has no bearing on notability likewise mentions in blogs which are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


No worries, just my way through. I do have an autobiography book, but it's not publicly published.(https://www.amazon.com/Uncovered-Naked-Truth-Life-Addiction/dp/0359802583/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=matt+mathews&qid=1610837203&sr=8-1) Viewers purchase the book to read. Would this book be a reliable source? How would you reference a book that is not a free public source? I would have thought magazine articles would have been. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattBiomathews (talk • contribs) 22:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your own book about yourself would not be an independent source, so no use whatsoever for establishing any notability, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 22:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:13:38, 16 January 2021 review of submission by Melvinblair


Melvinblair (talk) 22:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


22:32:09, 16 January 2021 review of submission by Melvinblair


Melvinblair (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:36:36, 16 January 2021 review of submission by Safmc

Hello, I have a question regarding article formatting. I am wondering if the article I submitted, Draft:Sophia Jensen, should not contain subtitles rather than containing one large paragraph. Considering that the article is a stub, is it acceptable to not divide it into multiple different sections? Thank you so much for any feeback! Safmc (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Safmc. Do not divide it into sections. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 17

08:13:10, 17 January 2021 review of draft by Damola33


My submission made 2 months ago hasn't been attended too by anyone.

Damola33 (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:01:04, 17 January 2021 review of submission by Midnight713

Thank you Padavalamkuttanpilla for the feedback. I am surprised that the references were deemed as not significant coverage. I can include more references if necessary. I imagined that the National Ballet company of a sovereign country would be worthy of a Wiki entry but am open to correction and can delete if references are not sufficient. Midnight713 (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Midnight713 (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been answered at the Teahouse. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:16:37, 17 January 2021 review of draft by Innovatao


I'm attempting to get this past initial draft, it was requested I put the page together, and as far as I can tell it has all of the reference and reference types requested by Wikipedia. However the notes I receive back only say they need more, but everything I can get hold of is on there. They are not an actress, they are an entrepreneur working for LQBTQ+ causes. I have had the page moved, mistaken for the fictional character, but nothing actually definitive. Could you please assist as I must be missing something. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Naomi_Bennett_(entrepreneur)

Innovatao (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:17:16, 17 January 2021 review of submission by Melvinblair


Melvinblair (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


20:52:15, 17 January 2021 review of submission by Sarika9140

Hello why have u rejected. State clearly.

I have used thejapantimes as citation, no useless information, no copyright violation, then why rejected? Tell plz Sarika9140 (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarika9140. The topic does not warrant a stand alone article. It is already covered more than adequately within Momo Challenge hoax. Spinoff articles should be discussed on the article's talk page as described in Wikipedia:Splitting. They are widely considered outside the scope of Articles for creation, and volunteer reviewers here may not take kindly to editors who waste their time by submitting spinoffs. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:15:07, 17 January 2021 review of draft by Softwaretestnews


I have received the reason for declining the article on Providence Office Products to be because the sources are not independent and reliable. All of the sources are independent and from reputable companies or media firms. Because I am new to Wikipedia editing, I would like any assistance possible on the steps necessary to improve the draft for publishing.

Thank you

softwaretestwriter (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 18

05:11:28, 18 January 2021 review of draft by Btspurplegalaxy


Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 05:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC) I'm requesting help because I need for someone to double-check my sources.[reply]

06:56:54, 18 January 2021 review of submission by Aslı Kırar

Need help me Aslı Kırar (talk) 06:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:33, 18 January 2021 review of draft by Sinfonicron


I am requesting help on behalf of Sinfonicron, a student-run light opera company at William & Mary. Due to the company's rich history and importance to the W&M community (which has been well documented by the W&M student publication Flat Hat, which is unaffiliated with Sinfonicron), we believe creating a wikipedia page is appropriate, but we have been told the article lacks references independent of the subject. The article has since been updated with more references from Flat Hat, but I am wondering if this is sufficient. I want to be careful, especially because the system mentioned a possible deletion if we did not fix the problem from before. Would it be worthwhile to include reviews from other organizations (outside of william and mary) as well? I just want to make sure I am properly addressing the issue presented.

Sinfonicron (talk) 08:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sinfonicron. Student publications commonly are given little or no weight in evaluating notability. In part this is because the writers are, by definition, still learning their trade. Also, they have a niche audience and small, local circulation. Their college's sports and other activities will be covered in their pages whether or not the wider world would consider them worthy of note. Any Wikipedia article would need to be based mainly on sources outside the college.
Searches of Google News and Google Books turned up nothing of substance in such sources. Past efforts to create an article on the topic have ended badly, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinfonicron and Draft:Sinfonicron Light Opera Company. It would be better to improve College of William & Mary by expanding the sentence about the company into a paragraph. I've left more information on your talk page about how to manage a conflict of interest. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:38:09, 18 January 2021 review of submission by 2402:1980:828A:2EC6:C84C:71DF:A794:C1B4


PLEASE PUBLISH THIS TO PUBLIC I WANT MANY PEOPLE KNOW THIS PERSON. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:1980:828A:2EC6:C84C:71DF:A794:C1B4 (talk) 12:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:48:01, 18 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by NmuoMmiri


I would like to know why this submission is not considered significant when it is discussed in Wikipedia articles. The academic organization, Black in AI, is founded by leading researchers in the field of artificial intelligence. As a computer science researcher, the current Wikipedia article on Artificial Intelligence, does not reflect many of the current topics in artificial intelligence such as ethical artificial intelligence, ethical machine learning, and diversity in artificial intelligence. In my opinion, the current article on artificial intelligence is quite antiquated. I would like assistance in learning how to edit and propose articles in Wikipedia so they can reflect some of the more recent trends in computer science and artificial intelligence research. Thank you for your assistance.

softwaretestwriter (talk) 14:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NmuoMmiri. The draft is unacceptable because it fails to demonstrate that the organization is notable. It fails to do so because of the sources it cites. The first is a primary source interview with one of the founders of the organization, with no arms length analysis by the interviewer. It is not independent. The second is authored by a student organizer of one of the organization's workshops, and published on Medium, a self-published blog host. It is neither independent nor reliable. The third is a workshop announcement written by the organization. It is neither independent, nor significant coverage. The fourth is a blog post (don't confuse Forbes magazine with forbes.com/sites pieces written by contributors instead of staff). The author co-wrote one book with AI in the title, but it wasn't published by an academic or mainstream press. It is effectively self-published, by an obscure publisher of which she is the editor-in-chief, so it isn't convincing evidence of subject matter expertise. Her blog post is not reliable. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic. The draft cites none.
Whether or not a topic is mentioned in Wikipedia articles is not a measure of notability. Neither is who founded an organization. That doesn't mean the organization is not notable, only that the draft fails to demonstrate any shred of notability. Creating new articles is overrated, and a terrible way for new editors to learn about contributing to Wikipedia. I, for example, edited the encyclopedia for eight years before creating an article. You don't have to wait that long, but it is much more effective to spend considerable time improving existing articles before trying to create new ones.
Existing articles are outside the scope of Articles for creation and this help desk. If one or more recent textbooks contain a chapter on ethical artificial intelligence, etc., feel free to be bold and add a section to Artificial intelligence summarizing the significant viewpoints on the topic. If you want assistance with that, start a discussion at Talk:Artificial intelligence, one of the WikiProjects listed there, at the general purpose Help Desk, or the Wikipedia:Teahouse. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Worldbruce Thank you for your response, it was very helpful. I understand your hesitancy when approving this entry as I also was somewhat skeptical until I conducted more research on the organization. It is quite a large organization and I am confident that it will eventually appear in Wikipedia whether I enter it or not. I will take your advice and begin to edit existing pages rather than entering new pages. However, I see quite a few topics from computer science that are missing entirely. I assume that my entries will be reverted often but I will attempt it anyway. Thank you so much for your guidance. I will visit the talk page at Artificial Intelligence and review the other sources you provided. Thank you for your conscientious criticism.

NmuoMmiri (talk)

14:48:10, 18 January 2021 review of submission by AryanKhanna475


Hi! What can we do to publish this article on wikipedia. It would be great if you can give us some advice on what needs to be changed. All the references have already been attached to the article. It is one of the biggest debating societies in Asia and conducts various events for discussions on crucial issues. Its an engaging article for many people within the country and interested in debating

AryanKhanna475 (talk) 14:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AryanKhanna475, please don't use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes. Wikipedia is neither a social network, nor a webhost, nor a platform for promotion. Also, it appears that you have a conflict of interest with the society. Please go through the conflict of interest policy. JavaHurricane 04:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:58:35, 18 January 2021 review of submission by Mjkboston


Hi, I am confused. Intellectual property, patents and trademarks are not a niche topic. I added a very recent and major reference from the WSJ that talk directly about this and a number of publications published by the Board Members of CIPU are also well published.

Do you want me to write more about intellectual property? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property


Mjkboston (talk) 15:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:47:25, 18 January 2021 review of draft by Giuseppe Ardolino


Hi, I received the review result of my draft page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sadas). It has been declined due to not neutral point of view and some references to modify. I asked for more details to improve my page and I am waiting for an answer from those who declined my draft's submission. It's possible to receive other details (on which sections and references to change) in order to move on to edit and publish? (I modified more times my page thanks to a lot of contributors, but I don't understand why it's not still ready to be published). For any kind of information, I am totally available. Really thanks so much for your availability Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:19:27, 18 January 2021 review of submission by Srimant ROSHAN

I am requesting for this article to be published, because when I was read the Wikipedia article on Shahu I. In that subsection of family ther is a mention of two son of Chhtrapati Shahu I from his two wife. But when I searched about that two son ,I get some websites who says about two sons but no name of that sons and finely in a article of royal ark describing about genealogy of Chhtrapati Shahu I a name of a son of Chhtrapati Shahu I and his wife Sagunabai was described but another 1 was unknown. And I have find a family tree of Shahu I in that also the same name of son and same name of wife was shown with same lifespan of that son as that shown in a royal ark article .So, that I requesting Wikipedia to publish this article.

Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He died in 1730 at the age of 2-3 years, what could he have possibly done to become notable? Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nor is there any content in the draft that could be merged elsewhere, since neither Royal Ark nor The History Files is a reliable source. "Fact, legend and imaginative reconstructions are hopelessly intermixed", in the words of one Wikipedian. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:47:50, 18 January 2021 review of submission by ThatOddEditor

Hi there, thank you for the quick review, previously there were insufficient references and information to the career of Ben Hum and I have further added on and included more about him. There are some sources which we are currently unable to quote due to his existing contract with his well-known management company 2mm Entertainment (can be searched wiki as well). Hopefully you could help to approve and we would be adding on his career details moving forward on a regular basis. Really appreciate your help! Thank you! ThatOddEditor (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:20:31, 18 January 2021 review of submission by Barouy13

Hello, I updated the JumpCloud draft with more information discussing company product and funding history, alongside inserting independent sources to support this information. I am wondering if the recent edits will allow for the draft to be accepted and published? Thank you. Barouy13 (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 22:56:38, 18 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by RavensEyeArt


In reference to draft: Jamey Stillings 1. I do not understand specifically where additional citations are needed or which citations need further information, sincere effort was made to read and follow wikipedia guidelines but as a newbie I appreciate I may not fully understand and so would appreciate further input. 2. It was requested to "cut down the bibliography to only a few of the most notable works", is that refering specifically the "SELECTED EDITORIAL PUBLICATIONS" section or elsewhere? Are there current inclusions that are suggested for removal? I will be most grateful for any RavensEyeArt (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)assistance and hope to continue to edit the article for further review. RavensEyeArt (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 19

02:26:37, 19 January 2021 review of draft by TipsyElephant


I was hoping to publish the drafts for some podcast awards so I created Draft:2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, Draft:2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, and Draft:2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards. I based these pages on 2019 iHeartRadio Music Awards and 2020 iHeartRadio Music Awards. All three of my drafts were rejected for having WP:ROUTINE coverage, but both the 2019 and 2020 podcast pages have more sources than the corresponding year for the music awards. Would it be possible to reverse the decision to decline my drafts or is there a way that I could improve the article so that they meet notability guidelines? If not then why are the music awards notable and if they aren't should I tag those for deletion as well? TipsyElephant (talk) 02:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:14:41, 19 January 2021 review of submission by ThatOddEditor

Hi I would like to request for a re-review and also some pointers as to why subject matter does not qualify for notability in this sense as mentioned person has significant works in his field of expertise. Please kindly advice how I could proceed to appeal this decision. Thank you so much! ThatOddEditor (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, profiles and spotify are not reliable independent sources and would need to be replaced. Theroadislong (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:17:07, 19 January 2021 review of submission by Sadaf kashmiri

Please let me know the reason why my article has been rejected and what should I do for improvement Sadaf kashmiri (talk) 06:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, because it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. That purpose is to summarize what independent reliable sources state about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. You essentially wrote a resume. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:35:50, 19 January 2021 review of submission by Pumpkinbanter123


Hello! I've taken the advice on the article published https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pickupp and changed the content such that its much more factual than promotional. Can I check if this works better?

Pumpkinbanter123 (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pumpkinbanter123 Wikipedia is not for merely telling about a company and what it does. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Your sources seem to be press release-type stories, announcements of routine business transactions, or announcements of what the company does. Things like that, along with staff interviews and other primary sources do not establish notability.
If you are associated with this company, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on formal disclosures you may be required to make. 331dot (talk) 10:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:06:10, 19 January 2021 review of draft by Jin at Samsung Galaxy official


11:06:10, 19 January 2021 review of submission by Jin at Samsung Galaxy official

I've submitted my drafts several times, and I'll like to understand in a more specific indication to the article where I'll need to work on, to avoid multiple rounds of revision.Jin at Samsung Galaxy official (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jin at Samsung Galaxy official If you represent or work for Samsung, you must review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on formal disclosures you are required to make; paid editing is required to be disclosed per the Wikipedia Terms of Use.
Your draft just tells about the event you are writing about. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the event, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable event. Wikipedia is not interested in what the representatives of an event want to say about it, only in what others completely unconnected with the event have chosen to say about it. YouTube is rarely considered to be a reliable source, especially if the videos are from the subject themselves. Press releases and routine announcements are also not acceptable for establishing notability. 331dot (talk) 11:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:47:06, 19 January 2021 review of draft by Callmejones


Hello, I would like to get my Draft reviewed again. I don't understand why the OFFICIAL Social Media couldn't be used as reliable sources, I mean they were from the OFFICIAL VERIFIED CHANNELS, so they should work. As the person is a Social Media personality, it's obvious for him to have such sources. It's not just words either, there's literally videos of him.

Anyway. I removed major parts of the social media references except two. Please review and let me know if this works.

Thanks!

Callmejones (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Callmejones, see WP:SPS. Self-published sources cannot be used to establish notability because they are not reliable sources, whether the account is verified or not. Statements on verified accounts can be used only in a few cases: see WP:ABOUTSELF. JavaHurricane 14:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JavaHurricane: Callmejones (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, what could be done? The person ain't getting the page now???

Callmejones, Notability on Wikipedia is determined by if the person has received significant coverage in multiple, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Additionally there are other parameters for notability mentioned at WP:BIO. If you can demonstrate that the subject passes the basic criteria of notability for people or passes the other criteria at WP:BIO, the draft may be accepted. JavaHurricane 04:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:44:00, 19 January 2021 review of submission by Imtiyazrasoool

Thanku for reviewing tis article . I have made some changes please review it back Imtiyazrasoool (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was rejected and tagged for speedy deletion so it will not be reviewed again. Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cash Chat App Article deletion.

16:21:00, 19 January 2021 review of submission by David Waynans

I am writing an article about Cash Chat and this has been declined and deleted many times yet this is not promotional its actual and true content about Cash Chat and the history about how it started and how it has progressed with citations and references, How can i be helped.

here is the article:

Cash Chat, now mainly Known as CashChatApp, is a Ugandan Social Media, Digital advertising and Financial Technology App built for messaging, digital advertising and financial services merged in one platform. It allows users to Chat one on one,Live streaming, Make chat groups, advertise, send voice messages, make voice and video calls, and share media files. Cash Chat application runs on mobile devices accessible via only Android devices. The App service requires user to use their preferred mobile number for registering with the service.

The Cash Chat application was created by Cash Chat Limited located on Semawata Road Plot 146 Ntinda, Kampala, Uganda. The Application has options of accessing it world wide and with different user locations. However, this app services like financial services are strictly accessible by users from East African countries while other countries can only access live streaming, instant chats, advertising, Voice and Video Calls.

2017-2018 Cash Chat App was founded by Asher Namanya Asanasio a former Expert in Telecommunications, finance and technology and Roger Magezi commonly known as Tywan as a Software Engineer, these two first started as Bold Cashers which is the main wallet for financial services in early 2017 and as numbers grew Asher Namanya proposed an idea that would include financial services merged with social media and in 2017 December Cash Chat was introduced first as a web application to help bold cashers and ease communication between members and this product failed and did not work according to Asher Namanya, and thats when they started a mobile app version for ease accessibility and mobility.

In November 2018, Cash chat was launched in Nairobi where it was piloted before it could reach other countries, Uganda, Rwanda and other European countries. Cash Chat team has worked closely well with Vrinsoft Team to ensure quality product and development of the stable app versions since 2018-to-date.

Asher Namanya got the name Cash Chat, Cash to represent finance and chat to represent social media knowing that this would be easy for users to get attracted to finance and social media at the same time. Cash Chat first worked under bold cashers limited as a product and in 2020 December it has been incorporated as Cash Chat Limited to manage her own products and services and now bold cashers remains as wallet for merchants, and bulky payments and this has not ceased from operating within cash chat mobile app.

In February 2019, Cash Chat launched user earnings and digital advertising where users would benefit from the services by earning from user status, allowing users to benefit from the app by earning or sharing revenue from Ads sponsored by companies that advertise on their user status. Cash Chat has recently been upgraded upgraded to 1.19 version which has increased the number of users to more-than 500,000 within active users 250,000 monthly. Cash Chat levies some fees on using its financial digital wallet to access payments and only this is available in Uganda, rwanda and Kenya countries where by users can send money from the wallets to different Banks in Kenya, can make mobile payments to different merchants and also send money between themselves from wallet to wallet respectively. in December 2020, Cash Chat made 2 years with Expected Revenue 3.8 Billion Shillings per year and most this money comes from user wallet activations, advertising and merchant payments.

In February, Cash Chat appointed Anna Talia Oze the NBS TV presenter to be her Product Ambassador

References.

[1]


David Waynans (talk) 16:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ 1. KTN News, Money transfers and Payment service, Standard Media, https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/ktnnews/video/2000180498/cash-chat-a-social-media-app-that-offers-money-transfer-and-payment-services-your-money 26, November, 2019 2. Solomon Obwoto Social Media and Money, Tech Jaja, https://techjaja.com/is-the-ugandan-cash-chat-app-an-alternative-to-whatsapp-pay/, 26th/ May/2020 3. Kenneth Kazibwe, Business News-Nile Post https://nilepost.co.ug/2020/05/06/cash-chat-app-upgraded-for-effective-user-experience/, 06/May/2020 4. NewVision Media, https://www.newvision.co.ug/news/1533957/cash-chat-launches-learning-live-streaming, December,2020.

17:15:49, 19 January 2021 review of submission by 94.36.183.116

Really frustrating! I provided tens of links to independent articles and pages which talk about Space Renaissance as an organization, its publications, events, initiatives. Yes, i also inserted links to the SRI websites, papers and articles. So, please i'd like to know what is the main issue: a) there are too many references to the association's publications b) the independent sources are not considered good enough

btw, i had a look to some friend organizations wiki page, that were accepted, such as Lifeboat Foundation, the Mars Society, the Moon Society. More, i took such pages as a sample, to help my search for useful links on the web... However, their pages were accepted, the Space Renaissance International not. SRI exists since 2008, it is rather known at least within the space community, we have hundreds of published papers, and many of us use to participate to the International Astronautical Congress each year. Our papers hold a good reputation on Research Gate and Academia.edu. So, what's wrong with SRI?

Thanks for your help, dedicating your precious time to analyze our case. Kind Regards, Ad Astra! Adriano V. Autino, SRI, President

94.36.183.116 (talk) 17:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must read the conflict of interest and paid editing policies for information on formal disclosures you must make. Other articles should not be cited as a reason for yours to exist; see other stuff exists. It is possible those articles could be problematic as well; as this is a volunteer project, it is possible to get inappropriate content by us. We can only address what we know about. I would say that the primary issue here is "b". A Wikipedia article should only summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about an organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Wikipedia is not interested in what an organization says about itself, only in what others choose to say about it. Most of your sources seem to cite the existence of papers or work you do; that's not what is being looked for. Please see Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:28:42, 19 January 2021 review of submission by WriticBee


WriticBee (talk) 17:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


January 20

00:13:51, 20 January 2021 review of draft by JCWrites


JCWrites (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hey there my name is Jeff and I'm kinda confused why the article I am trying to public is being declined, it says because it appears to be a promotion or something like that but I'm not getting paid or being told to write this. I have recently started writing articles on different sites about up and coming artists, rappers, singers, influencers, and just people who id think are good to write about. I added all the sources I got my information from and I just want to know what I need to change so that my future articles don't get declined either

JCWrites Part of the issue is that you are writing in the style of a biographical piece and not an encyclopedia article. I would suggest reviewing Your First Article and using the new user tutorial to learn more about Wikipedia before attempting to write an article; writing an article is the absolute hardest thing to succeed at on Wikipedia, it takes much time, effort, and practice, and diving in without experience and/or knowledge usually is not successful. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

00:21:23, 20 January 2021 review of draft by JCWrites


JCWrites (talk) 00:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Question by 103.134.115.143

my article has been declined and I'm not completely sure why, I added sources and I'm not even writing about my self or promoting someone. idk what To do know

Sandeep kr.Narayan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.134.115.143 (talk) 05:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:00:25, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Charikagomeda

this is a school histiry of Vijitha Central College.why my page is not accepted ? how can i resolve and publish? Charikagomeda (talk) 07:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charikagomeda The reviewer left you a message on your draft telling you why it was not accepted. It appears that the college does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization, at least based on the sources you provided. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:01:44, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Rajinder Singh Meena

07:01:44, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Rajinder Singh Meena


Rajinder Singh Meena (talk) 07:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


07:35:45, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Rajesh84Kumar


Rajesh84Kumar (talk) 07:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created a Wikipedia page for “North East Centre for Technology Application and Reach (NECTAR)” yesterday, and it’s been rejected continuosly. I’m new to Wikipedia and I’m having trouble understanding what I’ve done wrong. Please guide on how to get the page published.

Rajesh84Kumar Wikipedia does not have mere "pages", it has articles. Your draft has been rejected because it does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the center, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. In fact, you offer no sources at all. A Wikipedia article does not just tell about something. Please see Your First Article for more information.
If you are associated with this center, please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on formal disclosures you could be required to make. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:37:15, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Ttwilliams01


Ttwilliams01 (talk) 07:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


07:38:56, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Ttwilliams01


I would like to change the name of my draft Bishop Robert S. Williams. Can you please tell me how to do that? This is a biography.

Ttwilliams01 (talk) 07:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ttwilliams01 If you submit it for review and it is accepted, the reviewer will move the article into the encyclopedia and put it at the correct title. You could leave a note on the draft talk page about it, though. 331dot (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:42:52, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Swansonnery


The last time the article was rejected was due to the topic not being relevant enough, if I am not mistaken. I believe it is not the case anymore, as the topic in question (TasteAtlas) is growing in popularity and significance year after year. The results on Google concerning TasteAtlas are great in numbers—at the moment of writing this, the number is 438,000. I have not checked the same metrics the last time, but I am certain the number has increased numerous times since the last date of submission.

If the article is rejected again due to not being relevant enough, I would greatly appreciate some more detailed explanation as to why the reviewer(s) believe that to be the case.

Thank you for your time.

Swansonnery (talk) 07:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swansonnery The draft just tells about TasteAtlas and what they do. A Wikipedia article must do more, it must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Brief mentions, announcements of routine business activity, staff interviews, the company website, and other primary sources do not establish notability. As the draft was rejected, it will not be considered further at this time. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:48:36, 20 January 2021 review of submission by Rajesh84Kumar


Rajesh84Kumar (talk) 09:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


North East Centre For Technology Application and Reach (NECTAR) is already defined in the below two pages - 1. List of agencies of the government of India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_agencies_of_the_government_of_India#Department_of_Science_%26_Technology

2. Department of Science and Technology (India) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Science_and_Technology_(India)#Autonomous_S%26T_Institutions

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=1001583047"