When I'm a Moth: Revision history

17 November 2024

• curprev 12:1512:15, 17 November 2024 GreenC bot talk contribs 11,146 bytes +2 Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#time.com undo

12 August 2024

• curprev 11:0411:04, 12 August 2024 Vinnylospo talk contribs 11,144 bytes +52 →External links undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

29 June 2024

• curprev 04:1304:13, 29 June 2024 HeyElliott talk contribs 11,092 bytes −222 WP:DUPREF, MOS:CQ, added archives, ce undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

28 June 2024

• curprev 02:1202:12, 28 June 2024 HeyElliott talk contribs m 11,314 bytes +73 MOS:TIES undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

26 May 2024

• curprev 23:1823:18, 26 May 2024 FrescoBot talk contribs m 11,241 bytes −23 Bot: link syntax undo

9 December 2023

• curprev 21:3321:33, 9 December 2023 Shivertimbers433 talk contribs 11,264 bytes +104 →Reception undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:2921:29, 9 December 2023 Shivertimbers433 talk contribs 11,160 bytes −965 →Reception undo Tag: Visual edit

24 March 2023

• curprev 01:5401:54, 24 March 2023 Citation bot talk contribs 12,125 bytes +21 Add: date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Spinixster | Category:Works about Hillary Clinton | #UCB_Category 9/12 undo

7 October 2022

• curprev 17:3317:33, 7 October 2022 Citation bot talk contribs 12,104 bytes +175 Alter: template type, title. Add: website, date, magazine. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 991/2951 undo

2 September 2022

• curprev 03:4403:44, 2 September 2022 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs 11,929 bytes +34 →External links: add Category:2010s American films undo Tag: AWB

14 August 2022

• curprev 21:1421:14, 14 August 2022 WikiCleanerMan talk contribs 11,895 bytes −27 →External links: No longer stub undo
• curprev 21:1421:14, 14 August 2022 WikiCleanerMan talk contribs 11,922 bytes −27 No edit summary undo

9 August 2022

• curprev 05:4305:43, 9 August 2022 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs 11,949 bytes +6 →External links: move to Category:2010s Japanese-language films undo Tag: AWB

3 August 2022

• curprev 09:5109:51, 3 August 2022 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs m 11,943 bytes −36 →External links: remove Category:English-language films; now in subcat undo Tag: AWB

19 July 2022

• curprev 01:3801:38, 19 July 2022 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs 11,979 bytes +42 →External links: add Category:2010s English-language films undo Tag: AWB

24 June 2022

• curprev 13:3913:39, 24 June 2022 Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs m 11,937 bytes −28 →External links: Removed country category per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Archive 79#Should "films by country" categories remain all-inclusive?, removed: Category:American films undo Tag: AWB

10 April 2022

• curprev 04:0204:02, 10 April 2022 BattyBot talk contribs m 11,965 bytes −59 →Reception: Removed/fixed incorrect author parameter(s), performed general fixes undo Tag: AWB

30 March 2022

• curprev 09:1409:14, 30 March 2022 WikiCleanerBot talk contribs m 12,024 bytes 0 v2.04b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner

25 March 2022

• curprev 11:2711:27, 25 March 2022 Lizsimonrb talk contribs 12,024 bytes 0 it now shows both sides, with Blaarck's new detail being really great :) it doesnt use just one site to make the film seem great or awful. Everyone knows Rotten is not a good indicator of the real reception of a film, it leaves out so many critics. It's actually too bad wikipedia reinforces that :( hopefully neither of you are politically motivated, but this is about a controversial figure, so PLEASE, both of you, let this rest for a while, see what others add, move on to other pages. Thanks! undo
• curprev 11:1911:19, 25 March 2022 Lizsimonrb talk contribs 12,024 bytes +1,303 Undid revision 1079144419 by Blarrck (talk) Okay, you two :) this is officially looking like an edit war, so I am stepping in, not to moderate officially, but just to stop the war. I'm asking you both to hold off on this page and let others have a chance to improve it for a while. I have combined language from both of your edits, removing implications that it is the worst film of the year, etc, but also making clear that many disliked it. undo
• curprev 09:4809:48, 25 March 2022 Blarrck talk contribs 10,721 bytes +3,785 →Reception: I would consider this an actual attempt to compromise. Points from various reviews, both indepdendent and mainstream, and the overall reception, as done in practically every other film page on this site. Only used sources from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. Attempted to give equal weight to both sides. undo Tags: citing a blog or free web host Visual edit
• curprev 07:1507:15, 25 March 2022 Blarrck talk contribs 6,936 bytes −1,068 →Reception: You have again deleted the most notable and widely used sources from the body of the article. That's not a compromise. I've changed it to what actually seems to be more in line with Wikipedia film pages, which is the summary backed up with Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes. Plenty of 'independent critics' gave it negative reviews, so frankly your 'independent' angle doesn't hold much weight. I'm perfectly happy to have a moderator come in if it means that much to you. undo Tag: Visual edit

24 March 2022

• curprev 16:2616:26, 24 March 2022 86.138.228.196 talk 8,004 bytes +114 No edit summary undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 16:2516:25, 24 March 2022 86.138.228.196 talk 7,890 bytes −114 Undid revision 1079026025 by 86.138.228.196 (talk) as a compromise, I am including rotten as a reference for the negative reviews. undo Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 16:2216:22, 24 March 2022 86.138.228.196 talk 8,004 bytes +114 No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 16:0916:09, 24 March 2022 86.138.228.196 talk 7,890 bytes −493 Undid revision 1077914426 by Blarrck (talk) please stop just undoing. if you do that a third time, you can be reported to a moderator, but let's be civilized. it's not about not liking this or that. and Im not saying not to cite rotten and meta, but you should also take into consideration imdb and independent critics. perhaps there is a compromise that would work. Saying everyone hated the film is simply not accurate. undo Tags: Undo references removed

18 March 2022

• curprev 22:0222:02, 18 March 2022 Blarrck talk contribs 8,383 bytes +493 Undid revision by 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:6dfb:bfeb:e82d:cabf Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic are the sources used for overall reception of movies on almost every film page on this site. The fact you don't like what they're saying doesn't make them bias, especially since Rotten Tomatoes uses twice as many reviews as you. You haven't attempted to balance these with your own view, which seems to be unique to you and based on 5 much less notable sources, one of which is literally a '5 Reasons Why' post. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 13:3713:37, 18 March 2022 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:6dfb:bfeb:e82d:cabf talk 7,890 bytes −493 Undid revision 1074873059 by Blarrck (talk) please don't undo revisions for no stated reason when a clear reason for the revision has been explained. this doesn't improve the article. just takes us back to where we were before, with biased information. thanks undo Tags: Undo Reverted references removed

2 March 2022

• curprev 17:2717:27, 2 March 2022 Blarrck talk contribs 8,383 bytes +493 Undid revision 1071391512 by 2A00:23C8:5983:E900:1523:1940:7B0B:AD93 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

12 February 2022

• curprev 10:5110:51, 12 February 2022 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:1523:1940:7b0b:ad93 talk 7,890 bytes −493 This addition is far more impartial than the original "polarizing" claim, which I have restored. If you look only at that one article by metacritic, or only at rotten's percentage (based on very few reviews), it's largely negative, but if you are more objective and look also at independent critics or the imdb percentage, it is largely positive. So "polarized" seems more impartial than implying it is one of the worst films of the year. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

12 January 2022

• curprev 20:5420:54, 12 January 2022 Blarrck talk contribs m 8,383 bytes +212 →Reception: Language struck me as not impartial. Added Rotten Tomatoes to back up changes. undo Tag: Visual edit

3 January 2022

• curprev 00:3900:39, 3 January 2022 JCW-CleanerBot talk contribs m 8,171 bytes +4 task, replaced: website=Time (magazine) → website=Time undo Tag: AWB

29 December 2021

• curprev 12:5612:56, 29 December 2021 Blarrck talk contribs 8,167 bytes +235 Added Metacritic 'Worst Movies of 2021' listing undo Tag: Visual edit

28 August 2021

• curprev 16:1616:16, 28 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:c49f:a38e:d4a4:f696 talk 7,932 bytes +296 fixed revision 1041080759 by Bovineboy2008 (talk) yep, you're right about those, sorry! they didn't look like blogs. swapped them for non-blogs. thanks for catching that. undo
• curprev 12:5112:51, 28 August 2021 Bovineboy2008 talk contribs 7,636 bytes −253 both of these reviews are blogs and should not be used as sources per WP:UGC undo
• curprev 12:4812:48, 28 August 2021 Bovineboy2008 talk contribs 7,889 bytes +39 restore premiere date, festival showings count as releases undo
• curprev 12:2112:21, 28 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:9ed:6fa5:5f02:8431 talk 7,850 bytes −9 Undid revision 1041069189 by Bovineboy2008 (talk) release date is aug 27 2021. 2019 was a limited festival premiere. 2021 is not unsourced, see citation number 5 undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 12:2012:20, 28 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:9ed:6fa5:5f02:8431 talk 7,859 bytes +629 Undid revision 1041069333 by Bovineboy2008 (talk) these are not blogs. they are all indie critics undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:0211:02, 28 August 2021 Bovineboy2008 talk contribs 7,230 bytes −629 remove blog citations undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 11:0111:01, 28 August 2021 Bovineboy2008 talk contribs 7,859 bytes +9 add premiere to infobox, remove unsourced date undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 01:0901:09, 28 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:5dea:5a4c:cfa2:b1f9 talk 7,850 bytes +561 No edit summary undo

27 August 2021

• curprev 10:5510:55, 27 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:94a7:3c48:73dd:630 talk 7,289 bytes +872 No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:3210:32, 27 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:94a7:3c48:73dd:630 talk 6,417 bytes +11 →Release undo

26 August 2021

• curprev 22:4922:49, 26 August 2021 2a00:23c8:5983:e900:3c51:5dcd:4e96:2d18 talk 6,406 bytes +327 No edit summary undo

8 June 2021

• curprev 05:4905:49, 8 June 2021 Citation bot talk contribs 6,079 bytes −16 Alter: title. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Japanese-language films | #UCB_Category 2790/3710 undo

15 August 2020

• curprev 05:2005:20, 15 August 2020 188.216.67.180 talk 6,095 bytes 0 No edit summary undo

31 July 2020

• curprev 07:4507:45, 31 July 2020 Nat965 talk contribs m 6,095 bytes +1 Apply Gen fix(es), typo(s) fixed: on October 2016 → in October 2016 (2) undo Tag: AWB

19 September 2019

• curprev 14:4814:48, 19 September 2019 Monkbot talk contribs m 6,094 bytes +36 Task 16: replaced (9×) / removed (0×) deprecated |dead-url= and |deadurl= with |url-status=; undo Tag: AWB

4 September 2019

• curprev 22:4222:42, 4 September 2019 Atlantic306 talk contribs 6,058 bytes +1,498 Rescuing 9 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0 undo Tag: IABotManagementConsole [1.1]
• curprev 22:4122:41, 4 September 2019 Atlantic306 talk contribs 4,560 bytes +30 ced undo