Talk:Unified Modeling Language: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 12:3812:38, 27 February 2024 Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs 83,296 bytes +2 Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

curprev 19:1219:12, 1 February 2024 PaulT2022 talk contribs 83,294 bytes +483 →Limited use???: sources undo Tag: Reply

curprev 18:1318:13, 4 January 2024 Kvng talk contribs 82,811 bytes +26 add link undo
curprev 18:1118:11, 4 January 2024 Kvng talk contribs 82,785 bytes +87 checked undo

curprev 19:5319:53, 23 July 2023 Alexander Davronov talk contribs 82,698 bytes +354 →UML is dead: new topic undo Tag: CD

curprev 16:0916:09, 7 June 2022 MalnadachBot talk contribs m 82,344 bytes +21 Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

curprev 09:1309:13, 29 May 2022 MalnadachBot talk contribs m 82,323 bytes +28 Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) undo Tag: AWB

curprev 04:5904:59, 5 April 2022 Walter Görlitz talk contribs 82,295 bytes −166 Restored revision 1074322733 by WOSlinkerBot (talk): WP:NOTFORUM Talk pages are designed to discuss improvements to the article, not for general diescussion. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

curprev 19:0319:03, 4 April 2022 41.95.62.1 talk 82,461 bytes +166 →Unified Modeling Language: new section undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 17:1817:18, 27 February 2022 WOSlinkerBot talk contribs m 82,295 bytes 0 Fix misnested tag lint errors undo

curprev 19:5119:51, 14 October 2021 Kvng talk contribs m 82,295 bytes +10 mv {{FOLDOC}} to talk undo

curprev 10:3110:31, 24 October 2018 Janvlug talk contribs 82,285 bytes +292 →UML 2.5: 2.5.1 updates required in article undo

curprev 18:2818:28, 29 September 2017 NihlusBOT talk contribs 81,993 bytes +13 →External links modified: fixing Lint errors in signatures (Task 2) undo

curprev 12:3212:32, 18 February 2017 Dr JohnHRobb talk contribs 81,980 bytes +447 →"Has become ubiquitous in its field"?! undo

curprev 14:5914:59, 17 February 2017 Dr JohnHRobb talk contribs 81,533 bytes +102 →Limited use??? undo
curprev 14:5914:59, 17 February 2017 Dr JohnHRobb talk contribs 81,431 bytes +310 →Limited use??? undo

curprev 17:5417:54, 5 September 2016 MadScientistX11 talk contribs 81,121 bytes +658 →Limited use??? undo
curprev 16:5416:54, 5 September 2016 Walter Görlitz talk contribs 80,463 bytes +216 →Limited use???: censorship is not appropriate undo
curprev 15:4515:45, 5 September 2016 MadScientistX11 talk contribs 80,247 bytes +633 →Limited use??? undo

curprev 16:3616:36, 3 September 2016 Walter Görlitz talk contribs 79,614 bytes +211 →Limited use???: reply undo

curprev 14:2114:21, 2 September 2016 Dr JohnHRobb talk contribs m 79,403 bytes +20 →Limited use???: minor update undo
curprev 14:1914:19, 2 September 2016 SineBot talk contribs m 79,383 bytes +324 Signing comment by Dr JohnHRobb - "→Limited use???: new section" undo
curprev 14:1914:19, 2 September 2016 Dr JohnHRobb talk contribs 79,059 bytes +821 →Limited use???: new section undo

curprev 21:0621:06, 27 August 2015 Cyberbot II talk contribs 78,238 bytes +1,239 Notification of altered sources needing review (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) undo

curprev 19:1219:12, 4 August 2014 MadScientistX11 talk contribs 76,999 bytes +369 →Should the diagram over section be trimmed down to a series of images or should some text remain? undo
curprev 19:0819:08, 4 August 2014 MadScientistX11 talk contribs 76,630 bytes +938 →"Has become ubiquitous in its field"?! undo

curprev 08:3608:36, 24 July 2014 SineBot talk contribs m 75,692 bytes +296 Signing comment by 95.172.74.71 - "Questioning "ubiquitous" claim" undo
curprev 08:3508:35, 24 July 2014 95.172.74.71 talk 75,396 bytes +920 Questioning "ubiquitous" claim undo

curprev 03:2603:26, 27 May 2014 Mjchonoles talk contribs 74,476 bytes +626 →Diagrams need to be fixed: new section undo
curprev 03:1803:18, 27 May 2014 Mjchonoles talk contribs 73,850 bytes +320 →Who created UML?: OMG created the UML standards, UMl however, was proposed by others undo
curprev 03:0403:04, 27 May 2014 Mjchonoles talk contribs 73,530 bytes +399 →UML 2.5: clarification of UML 2.5 intent undo

curprev 12:5612:56, 26 May 2014 Armbrust talk contribs 73,131 bytes +336 →RFC - Should the (9 year old) criticism of UML 1.x be kept?: close undo

curprev 17:3017:30, 12 May 2014 Walter Görlitz talk contribs 72,795 bytes +13,897 Reverted 1 edit by 189.83.62.237 (talk) to last revision by Walter Görlitz. (TW) undo
curprev 17:1317:13, 12 May 2014 189.83.62.237 talk 58,898 bytes −13,897 No edit summary undo
curprev 05:0005:00, 12 May 2014 Walter Görlitz talk contribs 72,795 bytes +13,467 Reverted 1 edit by 189.83.62.237 (talk) to last revision by Legobot. (TW) undo

curprev 22:2922:29, 11 May 2014 189.83.62.237 talk 59,328 bytes −13,467 No edit summary undo

curprev 17:0017:00, 9 May 2014 Legobot talk contribs 72,795 bytes −26 Removing expired RFC template. undo

curprev 00:1600:16, 1 May 2014 Snow Rise talk contribs m 72,821 bytes 0 →Survey: Sheesh. undo
curprev 00:1600:16, 1 May 2014 Snow Rise talk contribs 72,821 bytes +89 →Survey undo
curprev 00:1400:14, 1 May 2014 Snow Rise talk contribs 72,732 bytes +482 →RFC - Should the (9 year old) criticism of UML 1.x be kept? undo

curprev 14:2114:21, 25 April 2014 Balaenoptera musculus talk contribs 72,250 bytes +89 →Survey: incorporate into body undo
curprev 14:2014:20, 25 April 2014 Balaenoptera musculus talk contribs 72,161 bytes +184 →Survey: '''Trim''' but keep references, per Homunq. undo

curprev 14:4214:42, 20 April 2014 Homunq talk contribs 71,977 bytes +523 →Survey: !vote to trim. undo

curprev 00:2300:23, 18 April 2014 FenixFeather talk contribs 71,454 bytes +529 →RFC - Should the (9 year old) criticism of UML 1.x be kept?: keep undo

curprev 08:0708:07, 15 April 2014 JonRichfield talk contribs 70,925 bytes +463 →RFC - Should the (9 year old) criticism of UML 1.x be kept? undo

curprev 14:5714:57, 11 April 2014 Mthinkcpp talk contribs 70,462 bytes +260 →RFC - Should the (9 year old) criticism of UML 1.x be kept? undo
curprev 10:4010:40, 11 April 2014 Aircorn talk contribs 70,202 bytes +279 →Survey: Keep the criticism, but remove the section undo

curprev 09:2509:25, 10 April 2014 Mthinkcpp talk contribs 69,923 bytes −9 →Should the diagram over section be trimmed down to a series of images or should some text remain? undo
curprev 08:4808:48, 10 April 2014 Salix alba talk contribs 69,932 bytes +1,053 →Survey: keep and expand undo

curprev 20:2720:27, 9 April 2014 Mdd talk contribs 68,879 bytes +274 →RFC - Should the (9 year old) criticism of UML 1.x be kept?: Final reply undo

27 February 2024

1 February 2024

4 January 2024

23 July 2023

7 June 2022

29 May 2022

5 April 2022

4 April 2022

27 February 2022

14 October 2021

24 October 2018

29 September 2017

18 February 2017

17 February 2017

5 September 2016

3 September 2016

2 September 2016

27 August 2015

4 August 2014

24 July 2014

27 May 2014

26 May 2014

12 May 2014

11 May 2014

9 May 2014

1 May 2014

25 April 2014

20 April 2014

18 April 2014

15 April 2014

11 April 2014

10 April 2014

9 April 2014