Wikipedia talk:Whacking with a wet trout

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whacking with a wet trout page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

This article has been identified as a potential area of controversy. If a dispute is getting out of hand, the Mediation Cabal may be able to help provide informal dispute resolution.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Wasn't "Wet Trout Slap" done earlier?

1979-1985 i was heavy into BBS's and i was sure i had slapped a couple before i went homeless... after my TRaSh-80 was "stolen" (get out... can't carry it? Boo Hoo!) didn't replace access until IRC was invented so decades may have clouded my mind but if my life had depended on it I'd have sworn it existed before 1986 AD Qazwiz (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about acceptable fish

Are other fish such as salmon acceptable for whacking users? Thanks. owuh (talk | she/her) 22:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better phrasing

"A 1971 Monty Python sketch called "The Fish-Slapping Dance" may be partly to blame"

I feel like "partly to blame" is not particularly encyclopedic wording, and could also be seen as not being neutral. But given that this is a humorous article I do want to toss this into the talk page, I'd rather not go against consensus if one exists about the language of this article. Piningforpines (talk) 23:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This really isn't done much by experienced editors any more

I propose we rewrite this to describe it as something that was common in the past but not really used much any more. This is almost exclusively used by clueless/new/young editors, many of whom are probably just wp:NOTHERE. I have seen multiple of these editors argue 'why is it there if you don't want people to use it.' I feel like this shouldn't be presented as something that is "common". Valereee (talk) 12:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:AGFAAAGFGF" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:AGFAAAGFGF has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 13 § Wikipedia:AGFAAAGFGF until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 17:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]