Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/V-Dash

Checkuser Cases

Here are the cases that relate sockpuppets to V-Dash.

So aparently he has a history of abusive sockpuppets. The only contact I've had with him is a fairly civil contact with him on my talk page here. I just thought I'd post this information. --Nn123645 (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is all stemming from Jeske's apparent appearance on my talk page for something I did not do. He even accused me of vandalism during the Christmas period, yet I was sick with food poisoning. He has been trying to stem arguments up with me for silly stuff like the debate about DnD being a board game.V-Dash (talk) 05:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "accusation" was a mistaken block on your part (I apologized for it and unblocked after I asked that the SPD V CU be rerun because I was not certain if you spoke French). As for the D&D thing, I'm sorry I even brought that issue up, and know never to engage you in debate ever again, if only because it's counterproductive and akin to arguing with a slime mold. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 06:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See what I mean? He literally got pissed just because I viewed DnD as a board game. He's supposed to be an admin, yet his behavior is not any better than mine as he is arousing arguments with me. No matter what I do, he's never happy. I haven't even been here recently until he wrongly accused me of something on my talk page along with a very vague reason.V-Dash (talk) 08:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even going to gratify that with a response, in part because the evidence flat-out rebuts your own statement. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 08:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're not going to give a response because you know I am right Jeske.V-Dash (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the diffs on the RfC. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 19:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeske, I'm filing a report for this as I am tired of you trying to push your power around.V-Dash (talk) 19:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

V-Dash, I don't know where you get the idea that you didn't make that personal attack. This diff (and this, this, this, and this) clearly show differently. A personal attack is a personal attack, no matter how old it is. MelicansMatkin (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melicans, that isn't what he's contesting; he's saying that I shouldn't have warned him for it because of its age. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 02:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification on that. MelicansMatkin (talk) 11:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so I'm being chewed because Mr. Curiano over here posted a very vague warning on my talk page? See, he wants me gone soo badly. But he knows that i have not done anything recently other than make a small edit to the Batman Returns article.V-Dash (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the diffs on the RfC say otherwise. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 18:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bull****. Why are you trying to change things to put you in a light darkened to me?V-Dash (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's a response section on the RfC, V-Dash. Edit it and give your side of the tale. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 19:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeske, this whole comment thing is ridiculous. Why don't you just stop trying to incite arguments with me all the time.V-Dash (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could give your side of the situation and see if anyone else agrees with you that this is ridiculous? Huh? Sounds like a good idea. -Sukecchi (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh YES, let's all agree with someone who posted a vague warning on my talk page.V-Dash (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A personal attack is a personal attack, no matter when it was made. Shortly after the warning was issued (the ame day I believe) you were given a full explanation. It was not "vague" at all. Stop harping on about it. MelicansMatkin (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, no I did not get a reason on the same day as someone else even agreed on Jeske's talk page. Anyhow, if past actions are accounted, then Jeske isn't excused either as he was responsible for the arguments between us about DnD.V-Dash (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but unlike you, I dropped them. Any person can see the matter ended when I stopped editing that section, and any person can glean from that section that they cannot debate you because you have a habit of ignoring counterpoints. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 15:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no Couriano, those weren't counterpoints, they were attacks. You were like a pirahana to carrion when I said DnD was a board game. You were very defensive about it Jeske. You refused to believe that someone who is an RPG fan hates DnD.V-Dash (talk) 19:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From the RfC page

Wishful thinking, as when we do, he starts attacking IP addresses and GFAQs users. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 22:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just want Jeske to leave me alone for a change and stop trying to heat debates up with me.V-Dash (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me heat debates up with you? You're looking for someone else. I suggest you stop assuming bad faith and making accusations sans evidence. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 02:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, Jeske Jeske, what do you call this right now?V-Dash (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would call this an attempt to make you realize how disagreeable your conduct is to almsot every Wikipedian that you have interacted with. MelicansMatkin (talk) 05:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So how is blaming me with vague warnings good behavior?V-Dash (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I explained the warning, V-Dash. You chose to disregard it in favor of pursuing another baseless AN/I thread against me. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 18:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're as innocent as you claim, then why are you so worried?V-Dash (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Query for V-Dash

I have to ask, V-Dash; what exactly do you hope to achieve on Wikipedia. It seems that wherever you go, there is inevitably an argument. In your last 500 edits, I count barely twenty that were made on articles, and were not part of an edit war (and most of those date back to October). Why do you come here, and what do you hope to accomplish? It certainly doesn't seem as if you are here to help build an encyclopedia. MelicansMatkin (talk) 05:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? Perhaps to save Wikipedia from the likes of people who only want to give a half done version of articles like the D/P pages where there exist no section detailing the differences.V-Dash (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This case is closed

Nothing wrong has been done. Both parties are at ease. Well, I am.V-Dash (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That may be your opinion, but it's no reason to go blanking the page. Friday (talk) 20:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I think that V-Dash's indefinite block makes this RfC a moot point. I have no objections to closing this case... although I wish it didn't have to come to V-Dash getting a permanent vacation. -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 08:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it obvious by this point he had no intention of changing his ways? I think it's for the best really... -Sukecchi (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]