Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Pnatt (post-block)

Hi, took me a while to understand the nature of the disagreement and i found this diff useful.[1] Addhoc 20:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SOCK [2] [3] [4] [5]
Compare: User:149.135.31.65, User:149.135.59.13, User:203.49.189.70, User:203.49.209.183
with: User:149.135.25.175, User:149.135.46.209, User:203.49.187.93, User:203.49.222.149
-- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal commentary

moved from 'Discussion' section on the project page. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 00:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The personal commentary includes: "The 'Top Friends' feature has been known to cause problems, frustration, and despair among MySpace users. Users often complain about not being on a person's 'Top Friends' list, not being ranked high up enough on the list, or having trouble deciding who to put in their 'Top Friends' and where." from this diff [6]. Addhoc 22:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Put a diff of this in the "evidence" section. -- Chris chat edits essays 03:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what's the focus of this RfC now?

This page has been moved from Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Myspaceaddictaust to its current location, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pnatt (post-block), following the indefinite blocking of the account as a sockpuppet of User:Pnatt. Commenting on the behaviour of a blocked sockpuppet of a banned user would appear to be moot; is there any further comment being requested? I was about to delist this from the index page until I saw that the name had been changed, implying a new scope. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not having moved the page or started the RfC, I can't comment on the motivations or necessity. What I would like to confirm is that by reporting new Pnatt socks on WP:AN/I they should be blocked just as his original account, right? Should I start a new section each time a new sock shows up or keep updating the same one as I did with MySpaceFreak (but the sock does not appear to be blocked yet)? Thanks. ju66l3r 23:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]