Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Ban appeals reform 2015
 | PLEASE NOTE:
|
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Time to start mixing the concrete.
[edit]This RFC has been open now since January and, with all the best will in the world, I think it's about time we stopped talking and started fixing. There was an RFC on precisely this subject last year (which I wasn't involved in due to other issues), and we're still sitting on our hands. I propose that we move the 5 most popular options on this RFC to a voting stage, to see which of these should be moved into a formal proposal for amending the BASC's structural layout.
Any suggestions on how to do this would be welcomed. Thanks. What does the Fish say? | Woof! 12:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Best ask Beeblebrox what he wants to do with it. I think he launched it as more of a survey than something that needs a consensus implementing. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)