Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Aaron Brenneman

General form

First of all, let me say that the default shape of user RfCs is shocking. There's not much space for resolution in a format that boils down to "each side piles on as much unevidentiary accusations as they like and then we vote." In a better world, I had intended to use this also as a venue to try out some alternatives to the current stocks-and-pillories meets Tammany Hall version. However I've not been contributing much so that didn't happen. However² anything started by me should have "Now with extra WP:BOLD!" written at the top, so if someone has some new and subversive idea about how an RfC should look here's a good place to try it out.
brenneman ^{L} 00:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked around and found Wikipedia:Editor review. I think that may be a better place to ask for a review of your overall actions the next time round, since RFC tend to be associated with a negative connotation. - Mailer Diablo 07:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]