Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Samtar
Appearance
![]() | This is an RfA talk page.
While voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
|
Loan out some votes?
[edit]@Samtar: Would you mind terribly if Godsy borrowed a few supports from you...say 50 or so? lNeverCry 13:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
@INeverCry, why would he do that???? JustAGuyOnWikipedia (talk) 17:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Psst JustAGuy, its a joke Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- ...because Samtar doesn't like emojis in edit summaries...and he needs to before he can get those 50....Lourdes 03:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
@DatGuy: I think I'm turning into an uptight Wikipedian......... JustAGuyOnWikipedia (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- A propose the ban hammer for uptight Wikipedians. ;-)—cyberpowerMerry Christmas:Unknown 03:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support use of the ban hammer! FOR SPARTA!!! — Gestrid (talk) 08:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- And for editors who renege on their assertions to not make any edit from alternative accounts :) Lourdes 11:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- And any sock who trying to blank the entire RFA page, and replaced with an YT link to Sam Rayburn Tollway congrats vid on the RFA. hehehe :D KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- And for editors who renege on their assertions to not make any edit from alternative accounts :) Lourdes 11:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)