Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/PrestonH
Edit count for PrestonH
[edit]Edit count
User:PrestonH run at Sun Dec 9 07:30:22 2007 GMT Category: 3 Image: 7 Mainspace 3589 Portal: 8 Talk: 29 Template: 37 User talk: 3496 User: 793 Wikipedia talk: 25 Wikipedia: 520 avg edits per page 1.28 earliest 21:38, 26 September 2006 number of unique pages 6641 total 8507 2006/9 44 2006/10 450 2006/11 310 2006/12 355 2007/1 86 2007/2 701 2007/3 619 2007/4 1127 2007/5 1382 2007/6 1050 2007/7 486 2007/8 962 2007/9 332 2007/10 302 2007/11 212 2007/12 89 (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary) Mainspace 8 Crash Bash 6 Crash Bandicoot (character) 5 Kenny Sia 5 Super transformation 4 Thermoregulation 4 Gary the Snail 4 SpongeBob SquarePants 4 American football 4 List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy 3 She's the Man 3 CALGE 3 Brian Lara 3 Universe 3 Have You Seen This Snail? 3 Westbrook Intermediate School Talk: 5 Pok�mon Stadium 5 Brock Lesnar 3 Spyro: Enter the Dragonfly 2 Chick slaughtering 2 Baggage allowance 2 Nothing, Arizona Template: 25 Vandalism information User: 443 PrestonH 219 PrestonH/monobook.js 13 PrestonH/RFA 8 PrestonH/Pi 6 PrestonH/Autograph Book 5 Georgewilliamherbert 5 PrestestSP 5 PrestonH/You are a likely vandal target if... 3 ANNAfoxlover/Autographs 3 PrestonH/monobook.css 3 PrestonH/cologneblue.js 3 Propol 2 Gaff 2 Jimbo Wales 2 Infophile User talk: 55 PrestonH 46 CaptainIron555 11 Nishkid64 10 Mr webby 7 King Lopez 7 AL2TB 7 Lupin 6 Cacycle 6 Matthew Richardson 5 205.244.118.139 5 Phaedriel 5 OdinReborn 5 Arch dude 4 75.80.41.13 4 74.98.253.40 Wikipedia: 68 Administrator intervention against vandalism 37 Sandbox 28 Requests for page protection 26 Motto of the day/Nominations/In review 25 Reference desk/Miscellaneous 14 Wikipediholism test 10 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 9 Requests for adminship/R 2 8 Editor review 7 Village pump (technical) 7 Confessed wikipediholics 7 Help desk 6 Stress alerts 6 Awareness statistics 5 Miscellany for deletion/User:Prester John (2nd nomination) Wikipedia talk: 9 Wikipediholism test 3 Long term abuse/Mmbabies 2 WikiProject Trivia Cleanup 2 Autoconfirmed Proposal 2 Wikipedians 2 Statistics If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot . Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2]
- The edit count was retrieved from this link at 07:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC).
Placement of response discussion
[edit]This user has not sufficiently demonstrated their ability to apply discretion and make decisions in situations where the decision isn't as clear as "yes, I'll revert this" or "no, I won't"/"yes, that's a typo" or "no, that's not a typo". Administrators need to be able to make good, educated, thoughtful, discretionary decisions and unfortunately this candidate hasn't displayed enough experience in doing so for me to be able to support. Daniel 11:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Furthermore, the deficiency in meaningful edits to mainspace means that this user lacks the understanding which is so crucial when applying administrator actions to/as a direct result of/in accordance with mainspace and mainspace-talk incidents. Daniel 11:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion, I don't believe that age should matter when comes to becoming an admin. It's rather the amount knowledge of Wikipedia that a user has, and the ability to follow the standards and keep Wikipedia as clean as possible. If he is able to revert vandalism like many other vandal fighters, I don't see why age should be regarded as a concern. (And Preston, I think none of this would have happened if you never mentioned your age. :D ) AL2TB Gab or Tab 17:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: I didn't mention age or maturity at all. Please retract your statement that I was influenced by age, as I find it to be an insult to my character. Daniel 22:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Daniel, perhaps he meant it for another user, or was just making the comment generally? Redrocketboy 22:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- If that was the case the user should have followed talk page conventions and not indented it how he/she did. The way it is now it is a direct response to my comment, and accuses me of being ageist. That's not on. Daniel 23:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Um, I put that above comment of mine in the wrong place; supposed to be in comment number 2. When I said I make silly mistakes, that was one of them. AL2TB Gab or Tab 01:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the note. I moved your comment up one so it was clear you were replying to oppose #2, moved this discussion (which is irrelevant to the candidacy as it focuses on placement) to the talk page (ie. here), and linked to this discussion in a tacked-on note to your original comment. Daniel 01:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Um, I put that above comment of mine in the wrong place; supposed to be in comment number 2. When I said I make silly mistakes, that was one of them. AL2TB Gab or Tab 01:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- If that was the case the user should have followed talk page conventions and not indented it how he/she did. The way it is now it is a direct response to my comment, and accuses me of being ageist. That's not on. Daniel 23:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Daniel, perhaps he meant it for another user, or was just making the comment generally? Redrocketboy 22:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: I didn't mention age or maturity at all. Please retract your statement that I was influenced by age, as I find it to be an insult to my character. Daniel 22:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion, I don't believe that age should matter when comes to becoming an admin. It's rather the amount knowledge of Wikipedia that a user has, and the ability to follow the standards and keep Wikipedia as clean as possible. If he is able to revert vandalism like many other vandal fighters, I don't see why age should be regarded as a concern. (And Preston, I think none of this would have happened if you never mentioned your age. :D ) AL2TB Gab or Tab 17:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)