Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/President-Wiki-Man

This is an RfA talk page.

While voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.

Please remain calm and civil in discussions on both pages, avoiding personal attacks and harassment. Uninvolved administrators can still fully intervene in RfAs.
Discussions should stay on-topic; consider moving or continuing discussions that are going off-topic elsewhere.
Move discussions not germane to the candidacy here, then link them with {{subst:rfan|dm|name of section header}}, indented to the original vote. Be conservative in using the template; obvious trolls and disruptive participants need not be noticed.
Otherwise, avoid starting discussions here if they would be of interest to RfA participants and can fit on the main RfA page; generally, discussions should begin at the "General comments" section or as an indented reply to a vote.

Dugwiki

Just noting that I would be very surprised if the person responding in this RfA is the same person who wrote User:Dugwiki/Surreal numbers and quite apart from the resolution of this RfA I'm a little concerned about the possibility of account impersonation. Alyo (chat·edits) 20:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per answer to optional question 3, a sockpuppet investigation my be appropriate.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For someone with 1.6k mainspace edits with this enthusiastic RfA, I'm willing to WP:AGF. However, a response from themself would be very appreciated. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 20:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that under these circumstances an SPI is appropriate. Jusdafax (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A CU check will not find anything on such an old account. –FlyingAce^✈hello 21:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, but that wouldn't be the purpose of a check. The candidate mentions using other accounts. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I missed that part. –FlyingAce^✈hello 21:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]