Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Plasticup
Edit count for Plasticup
[edit]User:Plasticup
run at Mon Sep 8 19:07:19 2008 GMT
Category: 8
Image: 4
Mainspace 11178
Portal: 22
Talk: 712
Template talk: 11
Template: 89
User talk: 357
User: 101
Wikipedia talk: 80
Wikipedia: 813
avg edits per page 1.58
earliest 22:34, 6 November 2006
number of unique pages 8476
total 13375
2006/11 69
2006/12 20
2007/1 19
2007/2 7
2007/3 1
2007/4 2
2007/5 3
2007/6 0
2007/7 3
2007/8 2755
2007/9 96
2007/10 8
2007/11 20
2007/12 0
2008/1 2
2008/2 1
2008/3 3
2008/4 3
2008/5 0
2008/6 135
2008/7 7454
2008/8 1874
2008/9 900
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
595 [2]Hurricane Dean
178 [3]Effects of Hurricane Dean in the Lesser Antilles
172 [4]Effects of Hurricane Dean in the Greater Antilles
160 [5]Meteorological history of Hurricane Dean
147 [6]Hurricane Gustav
122 [7]Meteorological history of Hurricane Gordon (1994)
87 [8]Effects of Hurricane Dean in Mexico
65 [9]Hurricane Vince (2005)
62 [10]Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season
60 [11]Meteorological history of Hurricane Gustav
54 [12]Tropical Storm Alpha (2005)
53 [13]2008 Atlantic hurricane season
53 [14]Hurricane Bertha (2008)
45 [15]Tropical Storm Delta (2005)
45 [16]Storm surge
Talk:
62 [17]Hurricane Gustav
57 [18]Hurricane Dean
27 [19]Tropical Storm Fay (2008)
23 [20]Meteorological history of Hurricane Gordon (1994)
22 [21]Hurricane Bertha (2008)
22 [22]2008 Atlantic hurricane season
20 [23]Effects of Hurricane Dean in Mexico
19 [24]Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season
17 [25]Cannabis (drug)
16 [26]Hurricane Dolly (2008)
13 [27]Meteorological history of Hurricane Dean
13 [28]Meteorological history of Hurricane Dean/to do
10 [29]Effects of Hurricane Dean in the Greater Antilles/to do
9 [30]Effects of Hurricane Dean in the Greater Antilles
9 [31]Hurricane Ike
Category:
2 [32]Hurricane Dean
Image:
2 [33]Plasticup AWB display.jpg
Portal:
11 [34]Tropical cyclones/Active tropical cyclones
Template:
12 [35]Wettest tropical cyclones in Haiti
6 [36]Wettest tropical cyclones in Australia
5 [37]Longest lived Atlantic tropical cyclones
5 [38]Wettest tropical cyclones in Bangladesh
5 [39]Wettest tropical cyclones in the Bahamas
3 [40]Wettest tropical cyclones in the Dominican Republic
2 [41]Most intense Atlantic hurricanes
Template talk:
10 [42]Did you know
User:
57 [43]Plasticup
9 [44]Plasticup/Sandbox TD2E
7 [45]Plasticup/MyFavorites
6 [46]Plasticup/Tropical cyclone jargon
4 [47]Plasticup/monobook.js
2 [48]Plasticup/Sandbox
2 [49]Plasticbot
2 [50]Cryforequanimity
User talk:
66 [51]Plasticup
9 [52]Juliancolton
8 [53]Hurricanehink
6 [54]Bluenorway
4 [55]Fartknocker123
4 [56]Ronan56g
3 [57]Everyme
3 [58]Thefutureboy
3 [59]CrazyC83
3 [60]72.193.254.254
3 [61]Chris1193
3 [62]Itfc+canes=me
3 [63]Bzuk
3 [64]Bender235
3 [65]Coneslayer
Wikipedia:
240 [66]Reference desk/Miscellaneous
102 [67]Reference desk/Science
66 [68]Reference desk/Humanities
32
[69]Featured article candidates/Meteorological history of Hurricane Gor
don (1994)
18
[70]Featured article candidates/Meteorological history of Hurricane Dea
n
16 [71]Featured article candidates/2005 Azores subtropical storm
15 [72]Requested articles/Business and economics
15 [73]Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight 30
15 [74]Good article nominations
14 [75]WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Noticeboard
14 [76]Bots/Requests for approval/Plasticbot
13 [77]Featured article candidates/Hurricane Vince (2005)
13 [78]Articles for deletion/Chris Rothfuss
11
[79]Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane se
ason
9 [80]Help desk
Wikipedia talk:
43 [81]WikiProject Tropical cyclones
13 [82]AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs
5 [83]AutoWikiBrowser
3 [84]WikiProject Geography
3 [85]2008 main page redesign proposal
3 [86]Reference desk
2 [87]AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
2 [88]Protection policy
If there were any problems, please [89]email Interiot or post at
[90]User talk:Interiot.
- The edit count was retrieved from this link at 19:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC).
Ignoring the humor thing for a second
[edit]I am seeing a lot of opposition based around me not needing the tools. Now, I was very up front about the fact that I don't plan to use the tools very often. Most likely my actions would be three or four moves/renames per month, and maybe a semi-protection every few weeks. I thought that, as long as I could demonstrate that I would not abuse the tools, it wasn't necessary for me to use them a million times a month. Am I mistaken here? Have I got the wrong idea? Plasticup T/C 00:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Exactly my thoughts. "No need for the tools" is possibly one of RfA's worst arguments. There are plenty of other legitimate issues, but so long as you prove that you won't abuse the tools, then need for the tools is irrelevant. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Very true. I always say that I think having 3000 admins with not much to do is much much better than having 1500 admins who are overworked and leave backlogs. We cannot go around and say no big deal but then say "well, it's not a big deal but hey, I can't imagine you needing it. So let's just not give you a chance to do good work". But as Juliancolton says, that's one of the worst arguments and I do not think a crat will fail a candidate just because of that. SoWhy 08:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Discussion with a Vandal
[edit]Comment I didn't think this discussion with an indef blocked vandal should be on the main page as the vandal had the goal of goading the candidate. But I didn't want to delete it outright as some may want to see how Plastican dealt with the scenario, so I moved it here.
- Indef blocked for vandalism and trolling. Daniel (talk) 06:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - Sorry, but it's just too risky given your abusive comments and lack of understanding of policy, etc --John Jacob Wilson Alueminous (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Indef blocked for vandalism and trolling. Daniel (talk) 06:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- #:::Ouch, it seems harsh to create an account just to weigh in on an obviously failed RfA. Plasticup T/C 05:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - #:::I'm not one to dive in and comment on every "oppose", but abusive? I think that is a rather heavy mischaracterization. Plasticup T/C 05:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - #::::This has nothing to do with 'jumping on the bandwagon', I just dont think you'll make a good admin. Sorry --John Jacob Wilson Alueminous (talk) 05:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - #:::::I'm !voting, per your answer (or lack of it rather) to Question #1, and also the fact that you have very little experience with administrator-related tasks (does that answer yor question? --John Jacob Wilson Alueminous (talk) 06:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - #::::::No, I already understand those points. My question is about how you perceived my comments to be abusive. Plasticup T/C 06:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - #::::::: Those comments toward Kurt in the opening sentence of a self-nom were simply unecessasary, and just look at the way that you replied to Xeno's question. --John Jacob Wilson Alueminous (talk) 06:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC) - #::::::::"Unnecessary" is not synonymous with "abusive". It cannot be abusive simply because it is unnecessary. What I am looking for is an explanation of how the joke towards Kurt was abusive. I already know that it was unnecessary—it was a joke, after all—but I am baffled by the accusations that it was abusive. Plasticup T/C 06:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)