Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Mizu onna sango15
Edit count for Mizu onna sango15
[edit]User:Mizu_onna_sango15
run at Thu Jul 10 02:05:19 2008 GMT
Mainspace 1880
Portal: 3
Talk: 233
Template talk: 1
Template: 2
User talk: 808
User: 297
Wikipedia talk: 91
Wikipedia: 434
avg edits per page 1.73
earliest 05:37, 13 October 2007
number of unique pages 2171
total 3749
2007/10 28
2007/11 333
2007/12 90
2008/1 58
2008/2 135
2008/3 141
2008/4 292
2008/5 1026
2008/6 1447
2008/7 199
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
99 [2]Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film)
33 [3]List of British words not widely used in the United States
15 [4]Tim Burton
14 [5]Menstrual product
13 [6]WALL-E
13 [7]Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (musical)
10 [8]Hot Topic
10 [9]List of American words not widely used in the United Kingdom
10
[10]List of words having different meanings in British and American Eng
lish
9 [11]Sweeney Todd (character)
9 [12]Mrs. Lovett
8
[13]Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street Deluxe Complete Edit
ion
7 [14]Promiscuity
7 [15]The Shape of Things to Come (Lost)
7 [16]Anglophilia
Talk:
56 [17]Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film)
21 [18]Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film)/GA1
11 [19]Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (musical)
7 [20]Sweeney Todd (character)
7 [21]Eric Cartman
6 [22]Tokyo Mew Mew
6 [23]List of British words not widely used in the United States
6 [24]Johnny Depp
4 [25]WALL-E
4 [26]Convicts in Australia
4 [27]Russia
4 [28]InuYasha
3 [29]Insanity
3 [30]Mrs. Lovett
3 [31]The Shape of Things to Come (Lost)
User:
135 [32]Mizu onna sango15
87 [33]Mizu onna sango15/AC
23 [34]Mizu onna sango15/Sandbox
8 [35]Mizu onna sango15/Todo
4 [36]Mizu onna sango15/monobook.js
3 [37]Mizu onna sango15/Userboxes
3 [38]Mizu onna sango15/Userboxes/Brithumour
2 [39]NoSeptember/List of failed RfAs (Chronological)
2 [40]Gabejgrant
2 [41]Mizu onna sango15/Userboxes/Burtonbest
User talk:
221 [42]Mizu onna sango15
14 [43]L337p4wn
11 [44]Malleus Fatuorum
11 [45]208.102.116.51
7 [46]84.134.121.103
6 [47]Malinaccier
6 [48]Iridescent
6 [49]Rlevse
5 [50]81.154.79.18
5 [51]68.14.77.122
4 [52]71.203.177.168
4 [53]24.96.247.85
4 [54]74.237.122.122
4 [55]71.192.59.22
4 [56]Thedemonhog
Wikipedia:
34 [57]Usernames for administrator attention
19 [58]Administrator intervention against vandalism
14 [59]Motto of the day/Nominations/In review
8 [60]Requests for adminship/Ryan
8 [61]Peer review/volunteers
7 [62]Pages needing translation into English
5 [63]Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching
5 [64]Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 16
5 [65]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
5 [66]Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 13
4 [67]Help desk
4 [68]Articles for deletion/Upholstery Frame
4 [69]Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 June 18
4 [70]Articles for deletion/List of songs with city names in the title
4 [71]Reference desk/Miscellaneous
Wikipedia talk:
34 [72]Requests for adminship
17 [73]WikiProject Anime and manga
11 [74]WikiProject Films
6 [75]WikiProject Musical Theatre
6 [76]Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching
5 [77]Userboxes/New Userboxes
4 [78]WikiProject League of Copyeditors
3 [79]Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
2 [80]Requests for adminship/Karanacs
2 [81]WikiProject Japan
If there were any problems, please [82]email Interiot or post at
[83]User talk:Interiot.
- The edit count was retrieved from this link at 02:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC).
Unfortunate withdrawal
[edit]I think that this candidate had a real chance to succeed. I fully support Wisdom and Ryan's right to oppose for whatever reasons they like, but even a brief perusal of this Mizu's contributions shows an editor without ego, who learns from mistakes. We need more admins like that, not less. S. Dean Jameson 03:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I wish she hadn't withdrawn - I suspect thing would get better on this RfA. I've asked her to reconsider. Ryan Postlethwaite 03:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I was actually surprised when I saw it, but it looks like it's reopened, good for her. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- The problem with reopening is that, with two such high-profile editors opposing her with such strong language, I knew there would be pileons. This is really too bad, as I think she would ame a really great administrator. May I ask why you seem to "auto oppose" anyone who brings a few names you feel are bad noms to UAA? I ask this in all sincerity, as I've seen you do that a couple of times now, and I was curious as to why you're so passionate about that particular type of mistake by a common editor. S. Dean Jameson 04:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to elaborate. Normally I don't like to oppose due to a few mistakes (diffs), however, UAA is an area that I feel quite strongly about due to its potential to inadvertently drive new editors away from the project. One or two mistakes can be overlooked, but closer to a dozen or so rattles my cage. I absolutely don't "auto-oppose" based on this reason alone. It's when the editor indicates in question 1 that they'd like to clear the UAA backlog. I can't ignore that. It's part of my criteria. The same goes for dodgy AIV reports. It's similar to Ryan's oppose for CSD, just a different admin area. I apologize if my language was too abrasive, that absolutely was not my intention. Regardless, I still stand behind my oppose. I hope that clarifies abit. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- The UAA policy is so fluid, it's inconsistent--it's a mess, I agree with several of her submissions. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)