User:Malcolmxl5
run at Sat Aug 23 14:36:49 2008 GMT
Category: 8
Image talk: 2
Image: 5
Mainspace 10961
Portal: 3
Talk: 2452
Template: 18
User talk: 437
User: 620
Wikipedia talk: 224
Wikipedia: 1449
avg edits per page 2.28
earliest 23:18, 9 April 2007
number of unique pages 7087
total 16179
2007/4 77
2007/5 206
2007/6 611
2007/7 867
2007/8 807
2007/9 1127
2007/10 1068
2007/11 1101
2007/12 2751
2008/1 1180
2008/2 534
2008/3 1184
2008/4 737
2008/5 1272
2008/6 776
2008/7 1225
2008/8 656
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
147 [2]Lomana LuaLua
92 [3]Nigel Reo-Coker
84 [4]Celtic F.C. season 2000-01
82 [5]Freddy Eastwood
79 [6]Scott Carson
76 [7]Carlton Cole
76 [8]Teddy Sheringham
74 [9]Jermain Defoe
70 [10]Billy Bonds
63 [11]Stephen Bywater
60 [12]First Civil Service Commissioner
55 [13]Hayden Mullins
54 [14]Office for National Statistics
54 [15]Bobby Zamora
51 [16]Marlon Harewood
Talk:
23 [17]Freddy Eastwood
17 [18]Carlos T�vez
11 [19]Yossi Benayoun
8 [20]William Lawrence Balls
8 [21]Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
7 [22]Scott Parker (footballer)
7 [23]Arthur James Turner
6 [24]Julian Waterfall Pollack
6 [25]Trenton, Ontario
5 [26]Rayavaram (Krishna district)
5 [27]Billy Bonds
5 [28]Edward Vick
5 [29]Tilbury
4 [30]George Kay
4 [31]Alan Curbishley
Image:
4 [32]Keynsham Town.JPG
Portal:
2 [33]Wales/New article announcements
Template:
3 [34]Mansfield Town F.C. squad
2 [35]Wrexham F.C. squad
User:
248 [36]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox
174 [37]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult
70 [38]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox2
61 [39]Malcolmxl5
12 [40]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive5
11 [41]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive4
9 [42]Woody/Sandbox
4 [43]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive2
4 [44]Fabrictramp
3 [45]Gogo Dodo
2 [46]Justmeherenow/Obama family of Kenya/Sandbox
2 [47]West Ham Fan
2 [48]MediaStudies110
User talk:
53 [49]Malcolmxl5
10 [50]Gogo Dodo
8 [51]Muffin Man 23
7 [52]69.157.65.118
6 [53]Poeloq
6 [54]Malcolmxl5/Archive 1
6 [55]Blotto adrift
5 [56]Joseffudge
5 [57]Redrocket
5 [58]Mr Hall of England
4 [59]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox
4 [60]Kurt Shaped Box
4 [61]Meco
4 [62]207.188.72.46
4 [63]86.160.240.191
Wikipedia:
150 [64]WikiProject Football
30 [65]WikiProject Football/New articles
14 [66]WikiProject Football/Booklist
12 [67]Articles for deletion/Frankie Loscavio
11 [68]Articles for deletion/Lewis Stanson
9 [69]WikiProject Football/Links
9 [70]Articles for deletion/Tymm Hoffman
9 [71]Articles for deletion/Nicolai Lomov
9 [72]Pages needing translation into English
8 [73]Administrator intervention against vandalism
7 [74]Articles for deletion/GlavUpDK
7 [75]Articles for deletion/Systemshock
7 [76]Articles for deletion/Celtic F.C. season 2000-01
6 [77]Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 15
6 [78]Articles for deletion/John FitzGerald
Wikipedia talk:
165 [79]WikiProject Football
6 [80]New pages patrol/patrolled pages
5 [81]WikiProject Non-league football
3 [82]WikiProject Automobiles/Archive 10
3 [83]WikiProject Astronomy
3 [84]Manual of Style (flags)
2 [85]WikiProject Mathematics
2 [86]Noticeboard for India-related topics
2 [87]WikiProject Australia
2 [88]WikiProject Topical outlines
2 [89]Archived delete discussions
If there were any problems, please [90]email Interiot or post at
[91]User talk:Interiot.
The edit count was retrieved from this link at 14:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC).
Surely an admin candidate who !votes Delete in AfDs for obviously non-encyclopedic articles should be a reason to support, not oppose? Or am I missing something? All those articles were obvious deletes apart from the two that ended up merge/no consensus. If we opposed everyone who !voted Delete on an AfD that was eventually kept, we'd have no admins at all. Also, some of those AfDs are over a year old.... bizarre. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a personal vendetta against the deleting admin, not the candidate at large. Furthermore, I'm sick of people that act almost like mere pond scum and just pounce on this like a soapbox. I remember one character in particular that did it to my RfA and others and was blocked sometime after for being a sockmaster. I'm not saying anything in particular, but just putting it out there. Yanksox (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What?! I am opposing because I disagree with the candidate's interpretation of inclusion criteria and how they would likely close AfDs. Those discussions I cite above were closed by several different admins. Which one do I allegedly have a vendetta against? --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho!20:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a vendetta against the deleting admin, but against all admins who have ever deleted anything. --T-rex21:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles has a right to oppose. He opposed my RFA, but I learned a lot because of his oppose !vote. It is important for editors to understand that deleting some articles can undo years of work of other editors. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
