Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Geni 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit count for Geni

[edit]
User:Geni

   run at Thu Aug 21 10:52:21 2008 GMT

   Category talk:         11
   Category:              14
   Help talk:             1
   Help:                  2
   Image talk:            31
   Image:                 334
   Mainspace              8795
   MediaWiki talk:        176
   MediaWiki:             116
   Portal talk:           2
   Portal:                3
   Talk:                  1668
   Template talk:         60
   Template:              149
   User talk:             2722
   User:                  474
   Wikipedia talk:        1484
   Wikipedia:             4188
   avg edits per page     2.29
   earliest               14:36, 30 March 2004
   number of unique pages 8838
   total                  20230

   2004/3  3
   2004/4  52
   2004/5  150
   2004/6  120
   2004/7  19
   2004/8  94
   2004/9  173
   2004/10 278
   2004/11 204
   2004/12 137
   2005/1  598
   2005/2  555
   2005/3  252
   2005/4  719
   2005/5  644
   2005/6  391
   2005/7  145
   2005/8  395
   2005/9  472
   2005/10 557
   2005/11 637
   2005/12 336
   2006/1  756
   2006/2  468
   2006/3  348
   2006/4  303
   2006/5  532
   2006/6  449
   2006/7  526
   2006/8  582
   2006/9  698
   2006/10 733
   2006/11 778
   2006/12 590
   2007/1  971
   2007/2  864
   2007/3  353
   2007/4  321
   2007/5  411
   2007/6  311
   2007/7  150
   2007/8  291
   2007/9  431
   2007/10 335
   2007/11 319
   2007/12 184
   2008/1  189
   2008/2  235
   2008/3  206
   2008/4  216
   2008/5  185
   2008/6  137
   2008/7  292
   2008/8  135

   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
   denotes edits without an edit summary)

                 Mainspace
   165 [2]Homeopathy
   124 [3]George W. Bush
   95  [4]Thiomersal
   75  [5]Alternative medicine
   71  [6]Bah�'u'll�h
   53  [7]Canals of Great Britain
   52  [8]Canal
   44  [9]List of banned books
   42  [10]Lordi
   41  [11]Sathya Sai Baba
   37  [12]Vaccine controversy
   32  [13]Wikipedia
   32  [14]Pope Benedict XVI
   28  [15]Bill Clinton
   28  [16]Gloucester and Sharpness Canal

                          Talk:
   256 [17]Homeopathy
   90  [18]Thiomersal
   76  [19]Bah�'u'll�h
   62  [20]Rorschach inkblot test
   51  [21]Giovanni di Stefano
   34  [22]Alternative medicine
   26  [23]Alternative medicine/Archive 8
   25  [24]Inconsistencies in the Bible
   23  [25]Bah�'u'll�h/Photo
   20  [26]Lordi
   19  [27]Main Page
   19  [28]History of Iraq
   19  [29]Canals of Great Britain
   19  [30]Animal testing
   17  [31]Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories

             Category talk:
   6 [32]Non-commercial use only images
   2 [33]European Space Agency images
   2 [34]Images on Wikimedia Commons

                Category:
   6 [35]Candidates for speedy deletion
   2 [36]Old Ordnance Survey map images

                  Image:
   6 [37]Example.jpg
   6 [38]Male no free image yet.png
   5 [39]Old Wembley Stadium empty2.jpg
   4 [40]Mod Caisson lock Geni.png
   3 [41]Pair of otters.JPG
   3 [42]Policebox barstar.png
   3 [43]Farne Islandscroped2.jpg
   3 [44]Tesseractslow.gif
   3 [45]Lewisite structure.PNG
   3 [46]Kaarebluitgenmohammedbookcov.jpg
   3 [47]Rolle canal lock at low tide.JPG
   3 [48]Cromford canal arm.jpg
   3 [49]Cromford in water.jpg
   3 [50]Super Bowl XLI.png
   3 [51]Replace this image1.PNG

               Image talk:
   10 [52]Replace this image female.svg
   9  [53]Example.jpg
   4  [54]Headbg.jpg
   2  [55]Replace this image1.svg
   2  [56]Smfirstholland.jpg

                MediaWiki:
   21 [57]Recentchangestext
   20 [58]Uploadtext
   17 [59]Watchdetails
   13 [60]Sitenotice
   8  [61]Blockiptext
   8  [62]Licenses
   6  [63]Newarticletext
   5  [64]Licenses/en-placeholder-people
   4  [65]Bad image list
   3  [66]Spam-whitelist
   3  [67]Anonnotice
   2  [68]Sitestatstext

       MediaWiki talk:
   54 [69]Sitenotice
   24 [70]Anonnotice
   20 [71]Recentchangestext
   16 [72]Licenses
   10 [73]Blockiptext
   10 [74]Uploadtext
   7  [75]Watchdetails
   6  [76]Common.js
   6  [77]Copyrightwarning
   5  [78]Sharedupload
   4  [79]Ipboptions
   3  [80]Newpageletter
   2  [81]Spam-whitelist
   2  [82]Revision-info
   2  [83]Loginend

               Portal talk:
   2 [84]Current events/2007 February 17

                     Template:
   9 [85]Sensitive IP addresses
   5 [86]No commentary on cover picture
   5 [87]R from merge
   5 [88]Administrators' noticeboard navbox
   4 [89]Rochdale Canal map
   4 [90]SVG-Logo
   4 [91]Guinness Drinker
   4 [92]Administrators' noticeboard navbox all
   3 [93]AutoReplaceable fair use buildings
   3 [94]Replaceable fair use
   3 [95]2008 Independent presidential candidates
   3 [96]Campaignbox Axis-Soviet War
   2 [97]Infobox Song
   2 [98]Policy2
   2 [99]In the news

         Template talk:
   15 [100]In the news
   8  [101]R from merge
   6  [102]Citation
   5  [103]Infobox Song
   4  [104]Replaceable fair use
   3  [105]Fact
   2  [106]Nothanks-sd
   2  [107]Cite book
   2  [108]Censorship
   2  [109]Unreferenced

                     User:
   115 [110]Geni/Pages I want to keep track of
   98  [111]Geni
   30  [112]Geni/temp
   29  [113]Geni/test
   19  [114]Jclemens/Acharya S
   11  [115]Geni/canals
   10  [116]Geni/I won this debate
   7   [117]Ahoerstemeier
   5   [118]Danny
   4   [119]Jimbo Wales
   4   [120]Sannse
   4   [121]Geni/3RR
   3   [122]The Moneycruncher/Gallery
   3   [123]Mike Nobody
   3   [124]Genisocky

           User talk:
   102 [125]Geni
   57  [126]Jimbo Wales
   24  [127]PalestineRemembered
   19  [128]Tony Sidaway
   11  [129]TTN/Archive 10
   10  [130]Gutza
   9   [131]MarkSweep
   9   [132]Lashonda
   9   [133]Aki009
   8   [134]Parrot of Doom
   8   [135]69.167.100.155
   8   [136]Solidusspriggan
   7   [137]Tawker
   7   [138]Carcharoth
   7   [139]Mike Nobody

                           Wikipedia:
   544 [140]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
   422 [141]Administrators' noticeboard
   329 [142]Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive9
   255 [143]Media copyright questions
   168 [144]Administrator intervention against vandalism
   113 [145]Help desk
   92  [146]Village pump (policy)
   51  [147]Copyright problems
   47  [148]Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/vote
   43  [149]Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote
   40  [150]Centralized discussion/Image placeholders
   35  [151]Village pump (miscellaneous)
   34  [152]Requests for adminship/Geni 2
   33  [153]Village pump (proposals)
   31  [154]Village pump (assistance)

                        Wikipedia talk:
   284 [155]Non-free content
   99  [156]Biographies of living persons
   83  [157]Requests for adminship
   56  [158]Copyrights/Can I use...
   53  [159]Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006
   39  [160]Three-revert rule
   37  [161]Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006
   28  [162]Copyright problems
   26  [163]WikiProject UK Waterways
   23  [164]Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote
   22  [165]Snowball clause
   20  [166]Image placeholders
   20  [167]Criteria for speedy deletion
   20  [168]WikiProject Albums
   16  [169]Be bold

   If there were any problems, please [170]email Interiot or post at
   [171]User talk:Interiot.


  • The edit count was retrieved from this link at 10:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC).

Purely procedural question

[edit]

Purely procedural question: because you were desysopped by Jimbo does he need to be notified of this RFA? – iridescent 11:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no since he refered the matter to arbcom.Geni 12:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
  1. Oppose — I view self-noms as prima facie evidence of power hunger. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Doesn't the fact that Geni could have appealed directly to the ArbCom first instead of going through the friendly neighbourhood chat that is RfA sort of ease your concern? user:Everyme 15:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Surely you realize that opposing every self-nom with the same string of text isn't going to carry any weight at all. Why bother? Besides your logic being fundamentally flawed, the fact that you only present a prima facie argument shows that you either haven't spent a second learning about this user or can't be bothered to formulate an opinion based on the individual case. In any event, it does not reflect well on your dedication to the RfA process. Plasticup T/C 18:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Plasticup, don't worry so much about Kurt's oppose. It's his prerogative and right to comment as he pleases. Nip this in the bud. Wisdom89 (T / C) 18:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would honestly like to understand his reasoning, but don't worry, I'm not going to fret over it. Plasticup T/C 19:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • What weight the 'crat(s) generally give to Kurt's standard response to self noms is severely deprecated by the circumstances of this case - who is going to nom a desysopped editor who is requesting the community restore the bit because they do not care for the "via Arbcom" option; how was this RfA ever going to be anything other than a self nom? Mind you, it gives pause to think that Kurt - a long time contributor who was around at the time of the Geni desysop - did not recognise the name when checking if it were self nommed; the sort of mistake that a script can make, when it isn't carefully reviewed. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]