Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Fluffernutter
Fluffernutter's edit stats using X!'s edit counter as of 16:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC):
Username: Fluffernutter
User groups: autoreviewer, filemover, reviewer, rollbacker
First edit: Apr 16, 2008 12:57:55
Unique pages edited: 6,782
Average edits per page: 1.95
Live edits: 12,771
Deleted edits: 482
Total edits (including deleted): 13,253
Namespace Totals
Article 9297 72.80%
Talk 343 2.69%
User 222 1.74%
User talk 2209 17.30%
Wikipedia 372 2.91%
Wikipedia talk 96 0.75%
File 143 1.12%
File talk 8 0.06%
Template 52 0.41%
Template talk 13 0.10%
Help 2 0.02%
Help talk 11 0.09%
Category 3 0.02%
Namespace Totals Pie Chart
Month counts
2008/04 9
2008/05 119
2008/06 267
2008/07 188
2008/08 148
2008/09 229
2008/10 223
2008/11 249
2008/12 116
2009/01 54
2009/02 131
2009/03 97
2009/04 97
2009/05 95
2009/06 174
2009/07 236
2009/08 160
2009/09 126
2009/10 248
2009/11 109
2009/12 193
2010/01 188
2010/02 227
2010/03 311
2010/04 74
2010/05 16
2010/06 59
2010/07 9
2010/08 20
2010/09 493
2010/10 1122
2010/11 292
2010/12 296
2011/01 259
2011/02 604
2011/03 332
2011/04 200
2011/05 734
2011/06 1677
2011/07 2363
2011/08 227
Top edited pages
Article
87 - Whoopi_Goldberg
82 - Virtual_Magic_Kingdom
67 - It_(novel)
66 - Stephen_King
66 - Shih_Tzu
63 - Chihuahua_(dog)
56 - The_Phantom_of_the_Opera
53 - Hamster
52 - Antonio_López_de_Santa_Anna
43 - Kaycee_Nicole
Talk
23 - Watson_(computer)
15 - The_Mousetrap
12 - Stephen_King
11 - Willamette_River/GA1
10 - Catfish_(film)
8 - It_(novel)
7 - Harold_Covington
6 - Wirtland_(micronation)
6 - Salem_witch_trials
5 - Horacio_Gutiérrez
User
107 - Fluffernutter
37 - Fluffernutter/CSD_log
10 - Fluffernutter/vector.js
8 - Fluffernutter/PROD_log
8 - Fluffernutter/History
6 - Fluffernutter/huggle.css
5 - Fluffernutter/Sandbox
4 - Chzz/dsc0511
4 - Fluffernutter/Mentorship
3 - Fluffernutter/twinkleoptions.js
User talk
120 - Fluffernutter
6 - Vasudeomangal
6 - FinanceQ
5 - 86.174.93.168
5 - Najamirah
5 - 72.11.253.203
5 - A.montenegro
5 - Emrgmgmtca
5 - Maryphillips1952
4 - 4.53.85.2
Wikipedia
61 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
28 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
18 - Requests_for_page_protection
18 - Huggle/Whitelist
13 - Meetup/NYC/Wiki-Conference/2009
11 - Requests_for_comment/Arbitration_Committee
8 - Meetup/NYC/April_2011
7 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring
7 - Sockpuppet_investigations/Wallflowers98
7 - Village_pump_(miscellaneous)
Wikipedia talk
14 - Meetup/NYC/March_2011
8 - Village_pump_(proposals)/Proposal_to_require_autoc...
7 - Spoiler
6 - Meetup/NYC/October_2010
5 - Meetup/NYC/Wiki-Conference/2009
3 - WikiProject_Military_history
3 - WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors
3 - Wiknic
2 - Requests_for_adminship
2 - Meetup/NYC/June_2011
File
2 - Dish_india_logo.png
1 - DaB.jpg
1 - DJ_Damian_P.jpg
1 - Dimanche_à_Bamako_album_cover.jpg
1 - Dortmunder_Actien_Brauerei_beer_bottle.jpg
1 - Damage_(superhero).jpg
1 - Damage_rune.JPG
1 - Damage.JPG
1 - KDDB_102.7_(Da_bomb)_logo.jpg
1 - Da_Bomb_(Kris_Kross_album_cover).jpg
File talk
1 - GALENA1.jpg
1 - Damage.JPG
1 - USS_Galena.jpg
1 - Damage_rune.JPG
1 - Damage_(superhero).jpg
1 - Dicktracy_(mural).jpg
1 - Ghost_Trick_Phantom_Detective_screenshot.jpg
1 - Ghost_Trick_Phantom_Detective_cover_art.jpg
Template
5 - Bronze_Age
4 - Airports_in_Greece
4 - LDS_sects/Granville_Hedrick
3 - 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_Group_A
2 - Biome
2 - Tamil_Nadu_legislative_election_results_by_allianc...
2 - Latest_preview_software_release/iOS
2 - 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_Group_A/doc
1 - Changwon_LG_Sakers_roster
1 - 2011_BFL_playoffs
Template talk
9 - Did_you_know
2 - LDS_sects/Granville_Hedrick
1 - Cleanup-IPA
1 - UNSCEAR_RE_type
Help
1 - MediaWiki_namespace
1 - HTML_in_wikitext
Help talk
9 - Contents/draft
1 - Contents
1 - Minor_edit
Category
3 - Recipients_of_the_Military_Cross
Someone explain to me...
[edit]
Why are there questions about exploding editors and rampaging sentient bots on this RfA? LadyofShalott 00:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Possibly because the RfA appears headed for what, in another space-time continuum, would be a WP:SNOW granting of the mop, and this is all that's left in the bucket to try and trip the editor up. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- There's an odd question from Keepscases because there's always an odd question from Keepscases; some have been much worse than this one, and I really enjoyed Fluffernutter's deadpan response. The others I can't speak to. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've seen some of Keepscases's other questions. Fluffernutter handled the situation(s) well. I'm just not sure there should have been such for her to answer. LadyofShalott 02:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not disagreeing with you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've seen some of Keepscases's other questions. Fluffernutter handled the situation(s) well. I'm just not sure there should have been such for her to answer. LadyofShalott 02:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- There's an odd question from Keepscases because there's always an odd question from Keepscases; some have been much worse than this one, and I really enjoyed Fluffernutter's deadpan response. The others I can't speak to. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Seems some editors have a purpose other than gauging the candidate's qualifications/abilities in regard to adminship. I give her credit for even entertaining some of them. Lara 03:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think the vast majority of participants disregard these absurdist questions and the answers given (or not given), although it is an opportunity for some administrator candidates to show good cheer. Cullen328 Let's
discuss it 03:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think it could be a kinda illustration that The Fluff is very hard to phase! We trust her ability to deal in an open and friendly manner with all kinds of rampant insanity, and be able to tell the safely insane from the real damage-seekers :o) Pesky (talk …stalk!) 04:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. I guess that I'd add: I was honestly sort of disappointed that I didn't get a Keepcases question during my own RfA, compared to some of the serious (and quite sensible) questions, a KC question would have been a nice distraction. I realize that other people are bothered by them, and I respect that, but they just give me a giggle. *shrug* --joe deckertalk to me 21:19, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think it could be a kinda illustration that The Fluff is very hard to phase! We trust her ability to deal in an open and friendly manner with all kinds of rampant insanity, and be able to tell the safely insane from the real damage-seekers :o) Pesky (talk …stalk!) 04:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think the vast majority of participants disregard these absurdist questions and the answers given (or not given), although it is an opportunity for some administrator candidates to show good cheer. Cullen328 Let's
discuss it 03:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ug. Its up to seven joke questions now. jorgenev 21:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll be very blunt here. Most of the stupid/silly/stupid questions are from people who are friendly with Fluffernutter in the IRC. #wikipedia-en is not often a very serious place, which is fine for the most part, since when it needs to be serious it can be, however the stupid/silly/stupid beheavior leeching over here is not acceptable. I applaud Fluffernutter for not indulging or feeding it here. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, I'm not really into all these joke questions, but as long as Fluffernutter doesn't object to them, I don't see why we should. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 16:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)