Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cobi
Mainspace 282 Portal: 1 Talk: 22 User talk: 264 User: 380 Wikipedia talk: 6 Wikipedia: 108 avg edits per page 1.98 earliest 05:37, 30 June 2007 number of unique pages 538 total 1063 2007/6 3 2007/7 207 2007/8 356 2007/9 476 2007/10 21 Mainspace 5 ClueNet 4 Miley Cyrus 4 Shell account 2 Boy racer 2 Red skye comics 2 RuPaul 2 Denver Broncos 2 Glen Jacobs 2 Fornication 2 Eclogues 2 Dakota Fanning Talk: 3 Shell account User: 69 ClueBot/FalsePositives/IPReports 65 ClueBot/FalsePositives 26 Cobi/monobook.js 18 ClueBot Commons/Infobox 14 ClueBot/Documentation 13 ClueBot II/ClueBot Script 10 ClueBot II/tasks 8 ClueBot Commons/BotNav 8 ClueBot 7 SineBot/Sandbox 7 ClueBot/Warnings/Vandal4 7 ClueBot/Warnings/Vandal1 6 ClueBot Commons/Userpage 6 ClueBot/Whitelist 5 ClueBot/Warnings/Vandal2 User talk: 57 ClueBot Commons 46 Cobi 7 209.244.42.97 6 CO 4 JoshEdgar 4 76.195.10.32 3 Thedjatclubrock 3 24.4.253.249 3 Collin89 2 Jossi 2 Kamakawaka 2 66.65.208.142 2 72.27.46.96 2 Wknight94 2 68.188.157.82 Wikipedia: 19 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot 14 WikiProject on open proxies 10 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot 2 8 Bots/Requests for approval 7 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II 6 Administrator intervention against vandalism 5 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot III 5 Sandbox 4 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II 2 4 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot IV 3 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot V 2 Bots/Status 2 Requests for adminship/Wikihermit 2 Wikipedia talk: 3 Bots/Requests for approval
Anciliary comments
[edit]These comments are general, but important in that sense so I thought I'd leave them here. They couldn't be made due to the RfA being suspended.
- in response to [1]
- As I submitted above it's not missing the forest for the trees, to abuse your metaphor it's protecting the forest from being burned down. What it really does is align our standards with what's really important. And we wouldn't need such protection from vandals (at least it would become drastically less important) if we had a stable version system implemented properly. In the end it still all boils down to the only thing we are here for is to write an encyclopedia. Finally sneaky vandalism is much more costly, and that can only be properly combatted by someone that is working on the material of the article. - Taxman Talk 22:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)