Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Betacommand 2
Betacommand's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 21:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC):
run at Thu Sep 6 21:18:20 2007 GMT
Category talk: 2
Category: 100
Image talk: 5
Image: 1743
Mainspace 21311
MediaWiki talk: 6
MediaWiki: 1
Portal talk: 1
Portal: 18
Talk: 1724
Template talk: 13
Template: 194
User talk: 7121
User: 2081
Wikipedia talk: 247
Wikipedia: 1777
avg edits per page 1.34
earliest 16:58, 7 November 2005
number of unique pages 27071
total 36344
2005/11 8
2005/12 9
2006/1 262
2006/2 477
2006/3 855
2006/4 656
2006/5 1822
2006/6 409
2006/7 452
2006/8 753
2006/9 1206
2006/10 1280
2006/11 661
2006/12 1266
2007/1 4006
2007/2 3776
2007/3 4899
2007/4 1613
2007/5 10341
2007/6 416
2007/7 496
2007/8 502
2007/9 179
Mainspace
44 Learning management system
40 Brazilian real
40 Penguin
27 Ottmar Liebert
20 Second Reality
20 Bullfrog
19 Christopher Columbus
16 Eureka (TV series)
15 2006
15 Somerset College
14 Alexander Fleming
13 Manic Street Preachers discography
12 Argentine peso
12 1987
11 List of Calvin and Hobbes books
Talk:
28 Phish discography
25 Hari Merdeka
25 Live Phish Series
16 German mark
13 Uzbekistani som
12 Rurouni Kenshin media
11 Majida El Roumi
10 Thai baht
8 Guster discography
8 Algerian dinar
8 ANS (box)
7 Elliott wave principle
6 Bully Records
6 1956 European Cup Final
5 Serbian dinar
Category:
3 All non-free Logos
2 All non-free media
Image:
7 Alice Paul stamp.gif
5 Ac.corridor.jpg
3 5440-fightforlove.jpg
3 1994 - Praire Home Invasion.jpg
3 3313Cover.jpg
3 Inattenstystnad.jpg
3 25Som.jpg
3 Petropolis coat arms.jpg
3 39Smooth.jpg
3 5440-showme.jpg
3 L50parkes.JPG
3 3X3Genesis.jpg
3 Polska Flaga Berlin.jpg
3 5440-sweeterthings.jpg
3 125px-Aquitaine logo.png
MediaWiki talk:
5 Spam-whitelist
Portal:
2 TechTV/Featured article/51
Template:
10 WPLISTS
8 RFCstyle list
6 Bot Top
6 Wider attention list
5 Commons ok
4 Civil aircraft by nationality
3 Botwait
3 User Shark
2 Non-sovereign territories of Europe
2 Copyedit progress
2 IRIB
2 RFCecon list
2 Coast Guard USA
2 Bot Bottom
2 User piano
Template talk:
2 Coin image box 2 singles
User:
378 Betacommand/monobook.js
229 AmiDaniel/VP/Approval
134 AmiDaniel/VP/L
83 Betacommand/Sandbox
82 Betacommand
69 Betacommand/Status
50 Betacommand/Vandalism
40 Betacommand/Sandbox.js
38 Betacommand/Bot Tasks
30 AmiDaniel/VP/L2
29 Betacommand/GeorgeMoney.js
17 Betacommand/Commons
14 Betacommand/StatusDiv
11 BetacommandBot
8 Betacommand/Spam.js
User talk:
752 Betacommand
146 BetacommandBot
139 Scraggy4
102 Dr31
64 Earl Andrew
59 Dori
50 Redux
49 Pharos04
49 KF
44 Neutrality
32 Onlyslighted
32 JillandJack
31 AmiDaniel/VandalProof
29 Cadastral
27 The Moving Finger Writes
Wikipedia:
213 Bot requests
107 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
104 Bots/Requests for approval
100 Administrators' noticeboard
82 WikiProject Spam/Report
72 Administrator intervention against vandalism
52 Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
48 Categories for discussion/Working
38 Requests for comment/User names
27 Requests for page protection
21 WikiProject Spam/LinkSearch/List
20 Requests for adminship/Betacommand
19 Bots/Requests for approval/BetacommandBot
15 Bureaucrats' noticeboard
14 Bots/Requests for approval/BetacommandBot Task 7
Wikipedia talk:
39 Bots/Approvals group
28 Bot policy
27 WikiProject Spam
27 Bots/Requests for approval
18 Non-free content
16 WikiProject Numismatics/Sandbox/Currency table
9 External links/Archive 16
7 Usernames for administrator attention
5 Categories for discussion
4 Template messages/Wikipedia namespace
4 Requests for arbitration/Betacommand/Proposed decision
3 Username policy
3 Non-free use rationale guideline
3 AutoWikiBrowser
3 Bot requests
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot.
Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]
Why are people talking about the bot?
[edit]I don't get this.. I think the bot is irrelevant, either on the support or the oppose side. Am I missing something? Friday (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- I am inclined to agree, but I suppose if a user had been careless with a bot, it could signal a potential lack of care with admin tools. The relevance in this case is debateable but hardly a critical issue, in my opinion. GDonato (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, he was desysopped because he ran his bot on his admin account, and, if he constantly makes mistakes with the bot, well... That's why people (including myself) are opposing on that basis, along wth the trust thing GDonate mentioned above. --Boricuæddie 22:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- He was, really? Re-reading Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand, bot usage was only one of the concerns. Myself, I am far more concerned about his history of inappropriate blocks, history of poor judgment, and unsatisfactory communication. The bot is small potatoes. Friday (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- There are occasional mistakes with the bot, I agree, and they are fixed, but from what I've seen, a lot of complaints about the bot have been from users who don't understand the image policy very well. Acalamari 22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, he was desysopped because he ran his bot on his admin account, and, if he constantly makes mistakes with the bot, well... That's why people (including myself) are opposing on that basis, along wth the trust thing GDonate mentioned above. --Boricuæddie 22:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
His behavior with the bot is part of his behavior. It is thus relevant. He persists in changing the tasks of the bot, running untested code on the live wiki, and not bending an inch to those who think that in large part the bot is doing the wrong task, and instead should be fixing the problems instead of tagging them. All of these are bad things in a prospective administrator, especially for someone with a history of repeatedly running a bot on their main account. GRBerry 20:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)