Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Anonymous Dissident 2
Anonymous Dissident's edit stats using Wannabe Kate
User:Anonymous_Dissident
run at Mon Aug 27 21:26:50 2007 GMT
Category: 23
Image: 40
Mainspace 3504
Portal: 2
Talk: 667
Template talk: 258
Template: 442
User talk: 2143
User: 970
Wikipedia talk: 365
Wikipedia: 1282
avg edits per page 2.97
earliest 09:19, 17 January 2007
number of unique pages 3264
total 9696
2007/1 510
2007/2 140
2007/3 315
2007/4 1249
2007/5 866
2007/6 2241
2007/7 2422
2007/8 1953
Mainspace
161 Bonaparte Crossing the Alps
113 History of poison
111 Johannes Rebmann
66 Bombings of Heilbronn in World War II
60 Abus Gun
53 Civilization One
51 Dusky Woodswallow
48 Mixtec writing
46 Alexander Brodie Spark
46 Black Brunswickers
39 Göttingen Seven
35 Baths of Zeuxippus
35 Lion
35 Aristotelian physics
34 Great Comet of 1577
Talk:
20 Civilization One
18 History of poison
17 Johannes Rebmann
16 Bombings of Heilbronn in World War II
14 Updown Court
10 Umaril The Unfeathered
8 Soldanella alpina
7 Lion
6 Time
6 Sevvostlag
5 List of characters in Camp Lazlo
5 Unterseeboot 11 (1935)
5 Abus Gun
5 Cave of Swallows
5 The Botanic Garden
Category:
4 WikiProject Malta articles
2 WikiProject Malta templates
2 WikiProject Malta members
2 WikiProject Malta
Image:
6 Gcmap.gif
3 Slug map.jpg
2 S43.jpg
2 DelarocheBCtA.jpg
2 HSUni.gif
2 Battle-issus.jpg
2 Kawa1.jpg
2 Skylab3 2.jpg
Template:
43 Makelist
38 GAreview
27 ThanksMALT
23 Infobox Bot
22 Infobox Bot/doc
21 Notfinished
16 WikiProject Malta
15 User NPOV2
13 Rwc
12 Busyweekdays
12 Alsouser
12 User exact age
12 User precise date
9 Did you know/Next update
8 Makelist (repetitive)
Template talk:
251 Did you know
2 Australian politics/name/Call to Australia
2 User contrib
User:
587 Anonymous Dissident
70 Anonymous Dissident/List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs
47 Anonymous Dissident/Userboxes
42 Anonymous Dissident/Pages created
35 R/EFD
31 SkyBot 1
26 Anonymous Dissident/Sandbox
16 Anonymous Dissident/monobook.js
12 Anonymous Dissident/Awards
10 Anonymous Dissident/Best
8 Anonymous Dissident/About
7 Giggy/Australian Cabal
7 Anonymous Dissident/FA
7 Anonymous Dissident/signature
6 Anonymous Dissident/monobook.css
User talk:
159 Anonymous Dissident
80 Yomangani
56 DarkFalls
49 Smee
45 Casliber
39 Bibliomaniac15
35 Wikihermit
23 Anonymous Dissident/List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs
23 Pendo 4
19 Awadewit
15 Zeragito
15 Phaedriel
15 Mister.Manticore
13 Rlest
13 Animum
Wikipedia:
111 Usernames for administrator attention
73 Requests for comment/User names
66 Administrator intervention against vandalism
53 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
45 Good article candidates
41 WikiProject Malta
34 Changing username/Usurpations
29 Requests for adminship/Anonymous Dissident
24 Requests for adminship/R
22 Village pump (proposals)
19 Requests for adminship/IvoShandor
15 Requests for adminship/Member
13 Bots/Requests for approval/SkyBot 1
13 Requests for adminship/DOSGuy
13 Articles for deletion/Dutch Australian
Wikipedia talk:
246 Requests for adminship
30 Criteria for speedy deletion
11 AutoWikiBrowser
8 Changing username/Usurpations
7 Did you know
7 WikiProject Malta
7 List of Wikipedians by number of edits
6 Administrators' noticeboard
5 Usernames for administrator attention
5 Requests for adminship/R
3 WikiProject Birds
3 Requests for comment/User names
3 Requests for adminship/Anonymous Dissident
3 Image copyright tags/Non-free
2 AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
Snowball promotion?
[edit]Unless there is a wager going on about whether this is going to hit 200, is there any reason to believe there is going to be a pile on opposition vote in the next few days? LessHeard vanU 21:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'd say let the nomination run its course, it doesn't do any harm to wait the full seven days. Melsaran (talk) 21:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why the rush? Let AD have the glory of being on WP:200 :D Majorly (talk) 21:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I guess not, but it would be a nice change... I reckon 170 - 180 with a doubling of the opposes (possibly to do with WP:Point, or something) ;~). LessHeard vanU 21:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I actually dont know if it will make 150, to be honest. I mean - it has slowed down so much. I don't mind either way. I'm just happy (and surprised!) I even got to the 50 mark, let alone 100! -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- 3 hours before the close... just you wait! Anyhow, this gives me the opportunity to be the very first to congratulate you on being handed the mop (and I guess that I had best promise you mine if this blows up in our face!) LessHeard vanU 21:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I tihnk congratulations might still be a bit premature, but thanks all the same. Cheers -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- (ec) Looking at rate of supports in the successful 200 nominations, the % of the end total support which occured within the first 48 hours of the seven-day discussion is pretty high. The figures are 67%, 45%, 62%, 71%, and 64% of the total support within the first two days. If support was linear, it'd be at 29%. Daniel 22:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Those are some interesting figures... -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- 3 hours before the close... just you wait! Anyhow, this gives me the opportunity to be the very first to congratulate you on being handed the mop (and I guess that I had best promise you mine if this blows up in our face!) LessHeard vanU 21:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I actually dont know if it will make 150, to be honest. I mean - it has slowed down so much. I don't mind either way. I'm just happy (and surprised!) I even got to the 50 mark, let alone 100! -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I once nominated someone and his RfA was closed as successful at 98/0/0 after 6 days. The 'crat who closed it early never answered the question whether this was an early WP:SNOW promotion, or if he'd just miscounted the days. Newyorkbrad 22:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well of course the 'crat never counted the days... it was just that one day convinced the 'crat that it was worth 2 and he closed it as consensus achieved! LessHeard vanU 22:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is a nice way to validate someone and spread some goodwill though...(supporting on an RfA that is) and plenty of folk don't tune in for days or weeks at a time..cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Snowball promotes are inappropriate uses of the bureaucrat tools, in my opinion. --Deskana (apples) 22:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- It is a nice way to validate someone and spread some goodwill though...(supporting on an RfA that is) and plenty of folk don't tune in for days or weeks at a time..cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)