Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Troubleshooting from Device Manager

Comment: Bushranger has issued a warning that I might be blocked if I post in AfD's that could be in the process of closing.  Realizing that this AfD might be closed at any moment, I've moved my responses here that would normally be placed on the Project Page.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

[1]

Had the "pertinent part" had sufficient weight to stand on its own, it would not reasonably have been necessary to support it with a comment about the commentator.  To amplify, assuming that the original comment is reasonable, the addition of the comment on the commentator is either proof that the comment on the commentator was not necessary, or that the "pertinent part" did not stand on its own.  The next comment uses magisterial fallacy to justify the comment on the commentator, so it is...fallacious.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

[2]

The argument based in the previous two Wikilinks is not defective per se, and would be worthy of agreement or rebuttal had they been the first response to my comment.  Nor is the previous argument defective because the author of the comment and I have a personal history.  The valid part of the previous argument is submerged because the word "indeed" has the effect of protecting a comment on the commentator.  Thus any logical response to the valid part of the argument would itself become submerged to the comment on the commentator.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC)